Meta Pixel
CNR: --
RE-OPEN/PENDING

MADHUKAR MISHRA vs EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED

Case NumberRERA-GRG-1686-2022
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing26 May 2026
Court⚖️ Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) ↗
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • MADHUKAR MISHRA
Respondent
  • EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED

Case Summary

MADHUKAR MISHRA filed Case No. RERA-GRG-1686-2022 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED. The case has undergone 10 hearings over 3 years and 9 months. The case is currently pending. 15 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (10)

  • 26MAY 2026
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR PHOOL SINGH SAINI

    Due to Administrative exigencies, the case is adjourned to 11.08.2026 for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 7APR 2026
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR PHOOL SINGH SAINI

    Due to Administrative exigencies, the case is adjourned to 26.05.2026 for the purpose as already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 21MAY 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    RE-OPENED

    Stage: RE-OPEN/PENDING

  • 20FEB 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    RE-OPENED

    Stage: RE-OPEN/PENDING

  • 5DEC 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Vide order dated 27.04.2023, the  Counsel for the complainant stated that case is barred by limitation as complainant has approached this Authority for DPC and other reliefs even after 3 years of execution of conveyance deed already executed on 01.03.2019 after handing over of possession on 05.02.2018 and offer of possession after obtaining OC was made on 08.01.2018 and hence, the issue of maintainability of complaint is to be decided. Case has been called out vbut no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant today. One more and last opportunity is being given to the complainant to put in appearance and argue the matter failing which matter shall be dismissed in default. Matter to come up  on 20.02.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 19SEP 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint has been received on 09.05.2022 and the reply was received on 17.08.2022. The proxy counsel for the complainant requests for a short adjournment as the arguing counsel is not available today. Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 05.12.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 22AUG 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Due  to administrative exigencies (re-distribution/re-allocation of court files), the case is adjourned. The matter to come up on 19.09.2023 for the purpose already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 27APR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The proxy counsel for the complainant requests for a short adjournment as the arguing counsel is not available today. Request is allowed. The counsel for the respondent states that case is barred by limitation as the complainant has approached this authority for DPC and other reliefs even after 3 years of execution of conveyance deed already executed on 01.03.2019 after   handing over of possession on 05.02.2018  and offer of possession after obtaining OC was made on 08.01.2018  and hence,  the issue of maintainability of complaint is to be decided.  Matter to come up  before full bench on  22.08.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 24NOV 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant. One more opportunity is granted to the parties to argue the matter. Matter to come up on 27.04.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 17AUG 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 09.05.2022 and registered as complaint no. 1686 of 2022. As per the registry, complainants had sent copy of complaint through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint made to the respondent is submitted by the complainants as available in the file. The registry of the authority also sent a notice to the respondent along with a copy of the complaint through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 14.05.2022 as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file. Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email on the following email addresses i.e., [email protected] and the same is shown to have delivered on the above email addresses as per the report available in the file.  It is proper service of the notice.          Written reply has not been filed by the respondent. The counsel for the respondent states at bar that the copy of reply both in hard and soft copy   has been supplied to the counsel of complainant and requests for a short adjournment for filing of  reply.  The respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e., by 31.08.2022 in the registry of the authority. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may be struck off.          Matter to come up on 24.11.2022  for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (15)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

*HARERA S- eunuennv HAIYA'{A REAT ESIAIE IIGUIATORY AUIHOIITY Eftqr.n a dqfl ftfiqr,Id qrErt!|. t.rrrq 20 PROCEEDINGS OF THI DAY Day and Date Tuesdavand 20.02.2024 Complaint No.

CR/16a6/2022 Case titled as Madhukar Mishr2vs Emaar MCF Land limited Represented through Emdar MCF Lrnd ImrteJ Respondent Represented throuSh Shri Harshit Batra.

Advocate 05.12.2023 Proceedins Recorded by Nare!h Kumari and HR ltlehta Proceedinss-cum'ordert The present complaint has been received on 09.05.2022 and the reply was received on 17.08.2022.

On the previous date of hearing i.e. on 27-4-2023, the counsel for the respondent stated that case is barred by limitation as complainant has approached this Authority tor DPC and other reliefs even after 3 years of execution of conveyance deed.lready €xecuted on 01.03.2019 after handing over of possessio. on 05.02.2018 and ofier of possession after obtaining oC was made on 08.01.2018 and henc€, the issue of mainta inability of complaint Nonepresenton behalfof thecomplainant-allott€€despiteonemoreand last opportunity given to him during earli€r proceedings on 5.1 2.2023.

The counsel for the respondent states that the unit already stands handed over and conv€yance deed has also been executedon 1.3.2019. ffHARERA !$- euntcnrv HARYANA IEAT ESTATE REGUIATOTY AUIHORITY ln view of the same, the complainanFallottee does not seem interested ro pursue the matter before the authority and hence the complainant is dismissed in defaulL Matterstands disposed off.

File be consigned to the .esisrry. 'v.t-/ vijay Kumar Goyal .b-1tJ.

Chairman 20.o2.2024

Similar Cases

⚖️
SUNITA SANTHOSHAM vs AVALON PROJECTS
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2019PENDING
⚖️
DALMIA FAMILY OFFICE TRUST vs ALMOND INFRABUILD PVT. LTD.
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2021PENDING
⚖️
RAVINDER SINGH vs PIYUSH BUILDWELL INDIA LIMITED
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2023PENDING
⚖️
SURESH KUMAR SHARMA vs M/S CHD DEVELOPERS LTD
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2022PENDING
⚖️
DR LT COL BINNY KOHLI vs NEO DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2022PENDING