Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

HITENDER KUMAR AND ANR vs MAGNUM INTERNATIONAL TRADING COMPANY PVT LTD

Case NumberRERA-GRG-4138-2021
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing19 Apr 2024
Court⚖️ Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) ↗
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2021

Party Details

Petitioner
  • HITENDER KUMAR AND ANR
Respondent
  • MAGNUM INTERNATIONAL TRADING COMPANY PVT LTD

Case Summary

HITENDER KUMAR AND ANR filed Case No. RERA-GRG-4138-2021 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against MAGNUM INTERNATIONAL TRADING COMPANY PVT LTD. The case has undergone 12 hearings over 2 years and 4 months. The case was disposed of on 19 Apr 2024. 23 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (12)

  • 19APR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The counsel for the complainant states that they have filed a settlement letter dated 15.02.2024 w.r.t settlement of the matter amicably and is filing application for withdrawal of the matter In view of the above,  the matter stands disposed of in terms of the settlement letter. File be consigned to the registry.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 9FEB 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 21.10.2021 and the reply was received on 06.03.2023. The proxy counsel for the complainant states that settlement talks are going on between the parties and  request for a short adjournment to file the settlement deed. Request is allowed.  The counsel for the respondent is directed to submit settlement deed within one month failing which arguments shall be heard on merits. Matter to come up on 19.04.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 8DEC 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 21.10.2021 and the reply was received on 06.03.2023. The counsel for the respondent states that the settlement talks are  in progress and requests for a short adjournment for filing settlement deed Request is allowed. Matter to come up on 09.02.2024 for filing settlement deed/arguments.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 24NOV 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Both the counsels for the parties state at bar that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties  and the settlement deed is under signing and they shall be filing the settlement deed in the authority within a week.   Matter to come up on 08.12.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 25AUG 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 21.10.2021 and the reply was received on 06.03.2023. Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the parties.  One final and last opportunity is being granted to the parties to appear and to argue the matter. Matter to come up on 24.11.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 7JUL 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    RE-OPENED

    Stage: RE-OPEN/PENDING

  • 3MAR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant. The proxy counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment as the main counsel is not available today. However they are ready to pay cost of Rs.10,000/- imposed on the previous date of hearing and he is directed to file the reply by Monday ( 06.03.2023) with an advance copy to the complainant otherwise to file reply after that Rs.25,000/- as cost shall be imposed. Matter to come up on 07.07.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 7NOV 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint was filed on 21.10.2021 and registered as complaint no. 4138 of 2021. On the last date of hearing, Shri Vikas Verma appeared on behalf of  respondent appeared wherein a direction was given to file the reply by 17.08.2022 with a cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid to the complainant. Despite proper service of notice, no written reply has yet been filed. Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant.  The counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment for filing of reply and objections on the ground that the complaint is not maintainable. The counsel for the respondent undertakes to file detailed reply within two weeks i.e. by 21.11.2022  in the registry with a copy to the complainant failing which cost of Rs.10,000/- be paid to the complainant. Last opportunity is being granted. In case the reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defence of the respondent may struck off.                 Matter to come up on  03.03.2023 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 3AUG 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    On the last date of hearing Mr. Vikas Verma Advocate has appeared from the respondent side. The counsel for the respondent requested an adjournment for filling reply and the same was allowed by directing the respondent to file reply within 2 weeks but the respondent has failed to file reply even on this date. The respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e. by 17.08.2022 in the registry with a copy to the complainants subject to costs of Rs.5,000/-, for not complying with the orders of the authority. Last opportunity is being granted. In case, reply is not filed even at this stage within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may be struck off.            The matter to come up on 07.11.2022 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 20APR 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 21.10.2021 and registered as complaint No. 4138 of 2021. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint along with annexures through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint along with annexures made to the respondent has been submitted by the complainant as available in the file.  The registry of the authority sent a notice with a copy of the complaint along with annexures through speed post of which delivery confirmed on 26.11.2021 as per the tracking report of the speed post available in the file.  Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at following email address: [email protected] The same is shown to have been delivered on the above email address as per the report available in the file.  It is proper service of the notice.                 Written reply not filed by the respondent. Counsel for the respondent request adjournment for filing reply.  The respondent is directed to file reply within two weeks i.e. by 05.05.2022 in the registry with a copy to the complainant.  In case reply is not filed within the above time,  thereafter a cost of Rs.5,000/- shall be imposed to be paid to the complainant alongwith the reply.  Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent may struck off.            The matter to come up on 03.08.2022 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 17FEB 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The Hon’ble Chairman  is on leave due to medical ground.  Matter is adjourned to 20.04.2022 for the purpose already fixed.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 14DEC 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: K K KHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Coram not complete. Matter is listed for 17.02.2022  for the purpose  already fixed.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (23)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

HARERA P* GURUGRAIV HARYANA REAt ESIATE REGUI,ATORY AUTHORIIY GURUGRAM ERqrun A-€q<r frt{qrro qrffirrul, T$Trq New PWD Rest House, Civil Lines, Gu.uBram, Haryana aq sq.ll lim!l ftaaaic 1.m ii{N PROCEEDINGS OF THE DAY 24 Day and Date Fridav and 07 .07 .2023 Complaint No.

CR/4BA/ZO2| Case titled as Hitender Kumar and Pooja Kumar Vs Magnum International Trading Company Pvt Ltd Complainant Hitender Kumar and Pooja Kumar Represented through None Respondent Magnum lnternational Trading Company PVt Ltd Respondent Represented through Shri Vikas Verma Advocate Last date of hearing 03.03.2023 Proceeding Recorded by Naresh Kumari and HR Mehta Proceedings The present complaint was filed on 21.10.2021and reply was received on 06.03.2023.

Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the complainant for the last three hearings. [t is already 1.50 PM.

No further wait is justified.

It appears that the complainant is not interested in pursuing the matter.

The complaint stands dismissed in default for non appearance of the complainant File be consigned to the registry.

An Authonty .onstitum.r setion 20 th!

R€al Estate (R.Sularion Md DewloPment) Act 2016 tm(tiwdlrtR).inG, 2016$nn20r'*rlto'rln{

Similar Cases

⚖️
ASHWANI KUMAR TANEJA AND MUKUL TANEJA vs MVL LIMITED
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2023PENDING
⚖️
GLS INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED vs HARISH BHARDWAJ
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2023PENDING
⚖️
DALMIA FAMILY OFFICE TRUST vs ANAND DIVINE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2021PENDING
⚖️
DALMIA FAMILY OFFICE TRUST vs ANAND DIVINE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2021PENDING
⚖️
NAMITA GULATI vs MVL LIMITED
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)2023PENDING