ASHU TANDON vs ASTER INFRAHOME PVT. LTD.
Party Details
- ASHU TANDON
- ASTER INFRAHOME PVT. LTD.
Case Summary
ASHU TANDON filed Case No. RERA-GRG-3751-2023 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against ASTER INFRAHOME PVT. LTD.. The case has undergone 7 hearings over 1 year and 3 months. The case is currently pending. 10 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (7)
- 4MAR 2025Hearing
Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN
Detailed order will follow. Matter stands disposed of.
Stage: DISPOSED
- 28JAN 2025Hearing
Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN
The present complaint was filed on 25.08.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent has been received on 02.11.2023. On last date of hearing dated 01.10.2024 the respondent stated that the money has been refunded to the bank after cancellation since the complainant has taken loan from the bank on the subject unit. The respondent was directed to submit the proof of the same but till date no such proof has been filed by the respondent. The succinct facts of the case are as follows: Sno Particulars Details 1. Name and location of the project “Green Court”, Sector 90, Gurugram, Haryana 2. Project area 10.125 acres 3. Nature of Project Affordable Group housing project 4. DTCP license no. 61 & 62 of 2014 dated 07.07.2014 5. Rera registered/ not registered and validity status Registered vide no. 137 of 2017 dated 28.08.2017 valid up to 22.01.2020 6. Unit no. 604, 6th floor, Tower- M admeasuring 526 sq. ft. (Page no. 17 of the complaint) 7. Allotment letter Not annexed 8. Date of execution of buyer’s agreement 18.01.2016 (Page no. 14 of the complaint) 9. Possession clause Clause 8(a) Subject to the force major circumstances, intervention of statutory authorities, receipt of occupation certificate and Allottee having timely complied with all its obligations, formalities or documentation, as prescribed by Developer and not being in default under any part hereof, including but not limited to the timely payment of installments of the other charges as per the payment plan, Stamp Duty and registration charges, the Developer proposes to offer possession of the Said Flat to the Allottee within period of 4(four) years from the date of approval of building plans or grant of environment clearance, whichever is later (hereinafter referred to as the "Commencement Date.”) 10. Building plan approvals 22.10.2014 [As mentioned in the buyer’s agreement at page 16 of complaint] 11. Environment clearance 22.01.2016 (As per information obtained by the planning branch) 12. Occupation certificate 17.11.2022 [pg. 116 of reply] 13. Basic sale consideration Rs.21,54,000/- (BSP) Rs.24,03,728/-(TSC) (As per SOA at page no. 38 of the complaint) 14. Total amount paid Rs.16,66,216/- (As per SOA at page no. 124 of the reply) 15. Offer of possession 24.11.2022 (As on page 123 of reply) 16. Reminder letter 12.06.2023, 22.06.2023, 04.07.2023 (Final reminder) 17. Cancellation letter 22.08.2023 (As on page 129 of reply) 18. Date of publication 20.07.2023 (Page no. 4 to 7 of the application under order 6 rule 17 of the CPC, 1908) The complainant is seeking the following reliefs: 1. Direct the respondent to pay interest at the applicable rate on account of delay in offering possession of ₹16,66,216/-. 2. Direct the respondent to waive off all the reasonable and unjustified charges levied by the respondent. 3. Direct the respondent to refund the remaining amount of GST charged from the complainants. 4. Direct the respondent to withdraw the cancellation notice and handover the possession of the flats to the complainant. Arguments heard. Order reserved. Parties may file brief written submissions within a period of 2 weeks with an advance copy to each other. Matter to come up on 04.03.2025 for pronouncement of order.
Stage: RESERVED
- 1OCT 2024Hearing
Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL
Shri Lakhan Kumar Mishra Advocate has appeared on behalf of the complainant today and filed power of attorney and he wishes to file additional documents which are to be filed within 2 weeks. In the present matter the respondent has cancelled the said unit as per the policy, 2013 and has refunded the amount after forfeiting the earnest money but no such proof is placed on record. The counsel for the respondent states that the complainant has taken loan from the bank and the said amount has been refunded back to the bank already. The counsel for the respondent is directed to submit the proof of the same in the registry of the authority within one week after serving the copy of the same to the complainant. Matter to come up on 28.01.2025 for further proceedings.
Stage: PENDING
Orders (10)
- 4MAR 2025orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 4MAR 2025judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 28JAN 2025orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A