Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

ASHU TANDON vs ASTER INFRAHOME PVT. LTD.

Case NumberRERA-GRG-3751-2023
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing4 Mar 2025
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • ASHU TANDON
Respondent
  • ASTER INFRAHOME PVT. LTD.

Case Summary

ASHU TANDON filed Case No. RERA-GRG-3751-2023 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against ASTER INFRAHOME PVT. LTD.. The case has undergone 7 hearings over 1 year and 3 months. The case is currently pending. 10 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (7)

  • 4MAR 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    Detailed order will follow.  Matter stands disposed of.

    Stage: DISPOSED

  • 28JAN 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 25.08.2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent has been received on 02.11.2023. On last date of hearing dated 01.10.2024 the respondent stated that the money has been refunded to the bank after cancellation since the complainant has taken loan from the bank on the subject unit. The respondent was directed to submit the proof of the same but till date no such proof has been filed by the respondent. The succinct facts of the case are as follows: Sno Particulars Details 1.        Name and location of the project “Green Court”, Sector 90, Gurugram, Haryana 2.        Project area 10.125 acres 3.        Nature of Project Affordable Group housing project 4.        DTCP license no. 61 & 62 of 2014 dated 07.07.2014 5.        Rera registered/ not registered and validity status Registered vide no. 137 of 2017 dated 28.08.2017 valid up to 22.01.2020 6.        Unit no. 604, 6th floor, Tower- M admeasuring 526 sq. ft. (Page no. 17 of the complaint) 7.        Allotment letter Not annexed 8.        Date of execution of buyer’s agreement 18.01.2016 (Page no. 14 of the complaint) 9.        Possession clause Clause 8(a) Subject to the force major circumstances, intervention of statutory authorities, receipt of occupation certificate and Allottee having timely complied with all its obligations, formalities or documentation, as prescribed by Developer and not being in default under any part hereof, including but not limited to the timely payment of installments of the other charges as per the payment plan, Stamp Duty and registration charges, the Developer proposes to offer possession of the Said Flat to the Allottee within period of 4(four) years from the date of approval of building plans or grant of environment clearance, whichever is later (hereinafter referred to as the "Commencement Date.”) 10.   Building plan approvals 22.10.2014 [As mentioned in the buyer’s agreement at page 16 of complaint] 11.   Environment clearance 22.01.2016 (As per information obtained by the planning branch) 12.   Occupation certificate 17.11.2022 [pg. 116 of reply] 13.   Basic sale consideration Rs.21,54,000/- (BSP) Rs.24,03,728/-(TSC) (As per SOA at page no. 38 of the complaint) 14.   Total amount paid Rs.16,66,216/- (As per SOA at page no. 124 of the reply) 15.   Offer of possession 24.11.2022 (As on page 123 of reply) 16.   Reminder letter 12.06.2023, 22.06.2023, 04.07.2023 (Final reminder) 17.   Cancellation letter 22.08.2023 (As on page 129 of reply) 18.   Date of publication 20.07.2023 (Page no. 4 to 7 of the application under order 6 rule 17 of the CPC, 1908)   The complainant is seeking the following reliefs: 1.             Direct the respondent to pay interest at the applicable rate on account of delay in offering possession of ₹16,66,216/-. 2.             Direct the respondent to waive off all the reasonable and unjustified charges levied by the respondent. 3.             Direct the respondent to refund the remaining amount of GST charged from the complainants. 4.             Direct the respondent to withdraw the cancellation notice and handover the possession of the flats to the complainant. Arguments heard. Order reserved. Parties may file brief written submissions within a period of 2 weeks with an advance copy to each other. Matter to come up on 04.03.2025 for pronouncement of order.

    Stage: RESERVED

  • 1OCT 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Shri Lakhan Kumar Mishra Advocate has appeared on behalf of the complainant today and filed power of attorney and he wishes to file additional documents which are to be filed within 2 weeks. In the present matter the respondent has cancelled the said unit as per the policy, 2013 and has refunded the amount after forfeiting the earnest money but no such proof is placed on record. The counsel for the respondent states that the complainant has taken loan from the bank and the said amount has been refunded back to the bank already. The counsel for the respondent is directed to submit the proof of the same in the registry of the authority within one week after serving the copy of the same to the complainant. Matter to come up on 28.01.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 9JUL 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

    The present complaint has been received on 25.08.2023 and the reply on was received on 02.11.2023. On the last date of hearing i.e., 18.04.2024, the proxy counsel for the respondent has moved an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC, 1908 and a copy of the same has been supplied to the counsel for the complainant during proceedings.  The counsel for the complainant was directed to file reply to the said application within 15 days with an advance copy to the respondent. The complainant has filed the reply of the said application on 03.05.2024. The counsel for the complainant further, stated that the respondent to restrain to create third party rights as the complainant /allottee has already paid substantial consideration money and after filing the complaint before the authority for DPC, the counsel of the respondent has sought an adjournment on earlier occasion on 30.11.2023 and 08.02.2024.   The respondent has filed an application under Section 151 of CPC, 1908 wherein stating that the Hon’ble Court of Smt. Sakshi Saini Learned Civil Judge on the basis of certain documents and figures after obtaining confirmation from the said department pleased to grant due date of offer of possession as July 2021. The counsel for the complainant is directed to file the response of the said application within a period of 15 days with an advance copy to the counsel for the respondent The counsel for the complainant states that the complainant has paid already 75% payment of the sale consideration. While offer of possession the respondent/promoter has raised extra amount of Rs.8 lac. The counsel for the respondent stated that due to non-payment of outstanding amount despite reminders, the unit has been cancelled and the amount has been refunded in the account of the complainant/allottee and its details are being filed in the registry. The counsel for the complainant along with complainant stated that amount has been transferred in their account without any consent and are also ready to pay back the amount and delays in payment of instalment was due to non-adjustment of DPC and undue charges were being demanded. Part arguments heard. Both the parties may submit their written submissions within 4 weeks with an advance copy to each other. Matter to come up on 01.10.2024 for final arguments and orders.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 18APR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The  proxy counsel for the respondent has moved an application under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC today and a copy of the same has been supplied to the counsel for the complainant during proceedings.  The counsel for the complainant is directed to file reply to the said application within 15 days with an advance copy to the respondent. The counsel for the complainant states that the respondent to restrain to create third party  rights  as the complainant allottee has already paid substantial consideration money and after filing the complaint before the authority for DPC, the counsel of the respondent has sought an adjournment on earlier occasion on 30.11.2023 and 08.02.2024. The counsel for the respondent states that due to non payment of outstanding amount despite reminders,  the unit has been cancelled and the amount has been refunded in the account of the complainant allottee and its details are being filed in the registry.     The counsel for the complainant alongwith complainant states that amount has been transferred in their account without any consent and are also ready to pay back the amount and delays in payment of instalment was due to non adjustment of DPC and undue charges were being  demanded. Matter be put up before the full bench on 09.07.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 8FEB 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint has been received on 25.08.2023 and the reply on was received on 02.11.2023, and also filed an application under Section 151 of CPC, 1908 wherein stating that the Hon’ble Court of Smt. Sakshi Saini Learned Civil Judge on the basis of certain documents and figures after obtaining confirmation from the said department pleased to grant due date of offer of possession as July 2021. The similar matters of the project are fixed before the full bench for 19.03.2024 wherein a view regarding the due date of handing over of possession is to be taken.  The counsel for the complainant states that matter is already decided by the authority in CR No.582/2022 and requesting for the relief in terms of the above order. The proxy counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment due to  non availability of main counsel.  The counsel for the respondent to file a copy clarifying date of obtaining EC and approval of building plans. Matter to come up on 18.04.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 30NOV 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint has been received on 25.08.2023 and the reply on was received on 02.11.2023. The counsel for the complainant states that copy of reply has not yet received from the respondent. The counsel for the respondent may supply a copy of reply to the counsel for the complainant within a period of 7 days. Matter to come up on 08.02.204 for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (10)