Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

NARENDER SINGH AND POONAM vs MS LANDMARK APARTMENTS PVT LTD

Case NumberRERA-GRG-2323-2023
Date of Filing--
Case TypeRERA-GRG
Last Hearing9 Oct 2025
StateHaryana
CityGurgaon
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • NARENDER SINGH AND POONAM
Respondent
  • MS LANDMARK APARTMENTS PVT LTD

Case Summary

NARENDER SINGH AND POONAM filed Case No. RERA-GRG-2323-2023 in the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) against MS LANDMARK APARTMENTS PVT LTD. The case has undergone 9 hearings over 2 years. The case is currently pending. 12 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (9)

  • 9OCT 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: ARUN KUMAR PHOOL SINGH SAINI

    Matter is dismissed.

    Stage: DISMISSED

  • 7AUG 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Matter to come up on 09.10.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 15MAY 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Matter to come up on 07.08.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 6MAR 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    Matter to come up on 15.05.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 14NOV 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The  present complaint was filed on 19.05.2023 and registered as complaint no. 2323 of 2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent has not been received till date. The counsel for the respondent requests for an adjournment to file reply to the complaint as well as application for dismissal of complaint as the said complaint is filed by 2 different allottees of two different units and hence, is not maintainable. The counsel for the complainant states that during the last proceedings it has been mistakenly written that the reply has been supplied which was not supplied, neither the cost has been paid.  The counsel for the respondent assures to supply copy within next 4 weeks and the cost shall also be paid before the next date of hearing. Matter to come up on 06.03.2025 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 1AUG 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was filed on 19.05.2023 and registered as complaint no. 2323 of 2023 and the reply on behalf of respondent has not been received till date. The counsel for the respondent has supplied a copy of reply to the counsel for the complainant during proceedings. Previous cost not paid and the same shall be paid by the respondent to the complainant before next date of hearing. Matter to come up on 14.11.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 4APR 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL

    The present complaint was received on 19.05.2023 and the registered as complaint no. 2323 of 2023. The registry of the authority sent a notice along with the copy of the complaint through speed post and email and delivery of same was confirmed on 12.05.2023 and 16.05.2023 respectively. On 11.01.2024 and 05.10.2023, respectively none was appeared on behalf of the respondent company despite proper service of notice. The counsel for the respondent states that legible copy of the complaint is not received. The counsel for the respondent may collect legible copy of the complaint from the registry of the authority and shall file reply within a period of three weeks failing which the defence of the respondent may be struck off.   Matter to come up on 1.8.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 11JAN 2024
    Hearing

    Judge: HARISH GUPTA

    As per the previous order dated 05.10.2023 respondent was directed to file reply within two weeks i.e. by 19.10.2023 in the registry with a copy to the complainant failing which cost of Rs. 5000/- shall be imposed upon the respondent. Further last opportunity was granted and it was made clear to the respondent that in case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defence of respondent shall be struck off. Despite several calls none appeared on behalf of respondent and further till today neither reply filed on behalf of respondent within stipulated period nor paid cost of Rs. 5000/-. As respondent is not appearing to contest the present complaint and also not paying cost so now matter is listed before authority on 04.04.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: PENDING

  • 5OCT 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: ASHOK SANGWAN

    The present complaint was filed on 19.05.2023 and registered as complaint No. 2323 of 2023. As per the registry, complainant has sent copy of complaint along with annexures through speed post as well as through email and proof regarding having the delivery of the complaint along with annexures made to the respondents has been submitted by the complainant as available in the file.  The registry of the authority sent a notice with a copy of the complaint along with annexures through speed post.  Registry has also sent the notice along with a copy of the complaint through email at following email address: [email protected], Land Mark [email protected] and [email protected] and the same is shown to has been delivered to on the above email address as per the report available in the file.  It is a proper service of the notice. Case has been called out but no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent today. Written reply has not been filed by the respondent so far. The counsel for the respondent requests for a short adjournment for filing of reply.  Respondents are directed to file reply within two weeks i.e., by 19.10.2023 in the registry with a copy to the complainant failing which cost of Rs.5000/- shall be imposed upon the respondent.  Last opportunity is being granted. In case reply is not filed within the time allowed, the defense of the respondent shall be struck-off. Matter to come up on 11.01.2024 for further proceedings.

    Stage: FIRST HEARING

Orders (12)