ANIL KUMAR AGRAWAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Party Details
- ANIL KUMAR AGRAWAL
- STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
- 2-State of Chhattisgarh
- 3-Municipal Corporation
- Raipur
- 4-Sub Divisional Officer
- 5-State of Chhattisgarh
Case Summary
ANIL KUMAR AGRAWAL filed Case No. WPC/2837/2023 in the Chhattisgarh High Court on 19 Jun 2023 against STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and 2-State of Chhattisgarh. The case was disposed of. 1 order has been issued in this matter.
Orders (1)
- 27JUN 2023JudgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.
2837 OF 2023 Anil Kumar Agrawal, S/o Late Shri Sukhsagar Agrawal, aged about 54 years, R/o, Sai Sadan, Bandhwapara, Police Station Purani Basti, Tehsil & District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. … Petitioner(s) versus 1.
State of Chhattisgarh, through: the Secretary, Housing & Environment Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Tahsil & District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2.
State of Chhattisgarh, through: the Collector, Tehsil & District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3.
Municipal Corporation, Raipur, through: the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Tehsil & District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
4.
Sub Divisional Officer, Tahsil & District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
5.
State of Chhattisgarh, through: Station House Officer, Police Station Purani Basti, Tehsill & District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. … Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr.
Pranjal Agrawal, Advocate.
For Respondents 1,2,4&5: Mr.
Raghvendra Pradhan, Addl.
A.G.
For Respondent 3 : Ms.
Pragati Kaushik, Advocate, under instructions of Mr.
Sandeep Dubey, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P.
Sam Koshy Order on Board [27 /06/2023] 1.
The Division Bench of this High Court in W.P.(PIL) No.112/2016 in the matter of Nitin Singhvi Vs.
State of Chhattisgarh & Others, disposed of on 27.4.2017, has already dealt with the grievance of the Petitioner and has issued a detailed instructions therein.
Thereafter, Contempt Petition No.908/2022 [Chhattisgarh Nagrik Sangharsh Samiti Vs.
Dr.
Sarveshwar Narendra Bhure & Anr.] arising out of the said matter also is seized by the Division Bench of this High Court.
Given the said facts, this Court is of the opinion that the proper course of action for the Petitioner is to approach the Division Bench either by filing a fresh Public Interest Litigation or by taking appropriate steps in the aforementioned pending Contempt Petition No.908/2022, highlighting the persistence of nuisance dealt with in the aforementioned W.P.(PIL) No.112/2016.
2/2016.
With aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (P.
Sam Koshy) sharad Judge