TEJAN RAM vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Case NumberWPC/2827/2023

Date of Filing12 Jun 2023

Case TypeWPC

Last Hearing--

Court⚖️ Chhattisgarh High Court ↗

State--

City--

Year of Filing2023

Petitioner

TEJAN RAM

Respondent

STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2-The Commissioner
3-The Collector
4-The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)
5-The Tahsildar
6-Munesh Gupta
7-Shailendra Kumar Sharma

TEJAN RAM filed Case No. WPC/2827/2023 in the Chhattisgarh High Court on 12 Jun 2023 against STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and 2-The Commissioner. The case was disposed of. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

26JUN 2023
Judgement
Order No: N/A
View Order ↗

-1- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.

2827 of 2023 1.

Tejan Ram S/o Shri Manbodh Aged About 57 Years By Caste Gond, R/o Village- Parsagudi, Police Station and Tahsil Rajpur, District - Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner Versus 1.

State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretory of The Revenue Department, Naya Raipur, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2.

The Commissioner Surguja Division, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 3.

The Collector Balrampur-Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj., Chhattisgarh 4.

The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Rajpur, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh 5.

The Tahsildar Office Of The Tahsil At Rajpur, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh 6.

Munesh Gupta S/o Shri Narayan Sao Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Dignagar, Police Station And Tahsil Rajpur, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

7.

Shailendra Kumar Sharma S/o Baijnath Sharma Aged About 55 Years R/o Rajpur Bakaspur Road, Police Station and Tahsil Rajpur, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri AK Yadav, Advocate.

For State : Shri Ashutosh Mishra, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P.

Sam Koshy Order on Board 26 .06.2023.

1.

The limited relief that the Petitioner seeks for in the present Writ Petition is for a direction to the Respondent No.2 to consider and decide the Revision Case No.14/A-23/2022-23 preferred by the petitioner before the Commissioner at the earliest.

The limited prayer is not opposed by the State counsel.

He submits that till now there was a vacancy of the Commissioner, Surguja Division.

Of late it has been filled and in that regard the proceedings can be expeditious now. -2- 3.

Given the said submission, the writ petition stands disposed of expecting that the respondent No. ondent No.2 shall take up the revision and decide the same in accordance with law at the earliest preferably within an outer limit of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.