Meta Pixel
CNR: CGHC010163012023
DISPOSED

RAVI SHARMA vs VIJAY KUMAR SHEREKAR

Case NumberMCC/299/2023
Date of Filing11 May 2023
Case TypeMCC
Last Hearing--
State--
City--
Year of Filing2023

Party Details

Petitioner
  • RAVI SHARMA
Respondent
  • VIJAY KUMAR SHEREKAR
  • 2-State of Chhattisgarh
  • 3-Commissioner
  • 4-Collector
  • 5-Superintendent of Police
  • 6-Thana Incharge
  • 7-M.M. Tripathi

Case Summary

RAVI SHARMA filed Case No. MCC/299/2023 in the Chhattisgarh High Court on 11 May 2023 against VIJAY KUMAR SHEREKAR and 2-State of Chhattisgarh. The case was disposed of. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

Orders (1)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No.

299 of 2023 Ravi Sharma S/o N.

K.

Sharma Aged About 52 Years R/o E.W.S.

471, Ward No.

10, Vaishali Nagar, Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Versus 1.

Vijay Kumar Sherekar S/o Late Gulab Rao Aged About 66 Years R/o Block- G, Plot No.

4, Nehru Nagar, East Bhilai District Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Urban, Secretary, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3.

Commissioner Municipal Corporation Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4.

Collector Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 5.

Superintendent Of Police Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 6.

Thana Incharge P.S.

Supela, Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 7.

M.M.

Tripathi Chairman Krishna Education Society, Krishna Public School, Nehru Nagar (East), Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr.

Priyank Rathi, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr.

Gagan Tiwari, Dy.

Govt.

Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 22.06 .2023 Heard Mr.

Priyank Rathi, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.

Gagan Tiwari, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State.

2 2.

This application has been filed for correction of typographical error in the order dated 08.05.2023.

3.

We had passed an order on 08.05.2023 in WPCR No.591 of 2019, in which, name of the Advocate on behalf of intervener has been typed as ‘Mr.

Ravi Sharma’, whereas Mr.

Priyank Rathi, learned counsel had appeared on behalf of the intervener.

4.

Therefore, in the appearance part as well as in the first paragraph of the order, name of Mr.

Ravi Sharma is rectified and the same be read as Mr.

Priyank Rathi, Advocate.

5.

With the aforesaid modification, this MCC is allowed. s allowed.

A copy of this order be placed in the record of WPCR No.591 of 2019.

Sd/- Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu