UCHCHO @ SANTOSH YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No.

273 of 2023 Uchcho @ Santosh Yadav S/o Pawan Yadav Aged About 35 Years (Now Aged About 51 Years) R/o Village Bheemdonger, Police Station Bhawanipatnam, District Kalahandi, Gudhiyari, Police Station Gudhiyari, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Versus 1.

State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2.

Director General of Police (Prisons) Jail Head Quarter, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3.

Inspector Grneral (Prisons) Jail Head Quarter Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4.

Jail Suprintendent Central Jail Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5.

Secretary Legal Aid Service Authority, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr.

Bishnu Muni, Advocate.

For Respondents/State : Mr.

Gurudev I.

Sharan, Government Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 27.06.2023 The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: 2 “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the claim of petitioner for grant of benefit of remission under Section 432 of CRPC Read with Rules 358 of Chhattisgarh Prison Rules 1968.

10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.

3 & 4 to forward the report of petitioner to the Prison Review Board under the Rule 358 of Chhattisgarh Prison Rules 1968 for his consideration for remission under Section 432 of CRPC.

10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deems fit and proper may also be awarded to the petitioner including the cost of the petition.” 2.

Mr. n.” 2.

Mr.

Bishnu Muni, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with a liberty to file afresh with better particulars.

Sharan, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents No.

1 to 4/State has no objection.

4.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for.

5.

Registry is directed to return the certified copies to the petitioner after retaining photocopies of the same.

Sd/- Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan