RAKESH DEWANGAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Case NumberWPC/2183/2023

Date of Filing6 May 2023

Case TypeWPC

Last Hearing--

Court⚖️ Chhattisgarh High Court ↗

State--

City--

Year of Filing2023

Petitioner

RAKESH DEWANGAN

Respondent

STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2-STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
3-Collector
4-Sub Divisional Officer (Rev)/ Land Acquisition Officer
5-Executive Engineer
6-Assistant Executive Engineer
7-Tahsildar

RAKESH DEWANGAN filed Case No. WPC/2183/2023 in the Chhattisgarh High Court on 6 May 2023 against STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and 2-STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. The case was disposed of. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

10MAY 2023
Judgement
Order No: N/A
View Order ↗

-1- HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.

2183 of 2023 1.

Rakesh Dewangan S/o Late Shri Ashok Dewangan Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Manikpur, Tahsil Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) --- Petitioner Versus 1.

State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2.

State Of Chhattisgarh The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3.

Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4.

Sub Divisional Officer (Rev)/ Land Acquisition Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

5.

Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur.

6.

Assistant Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

7.

Tahsildar Tahsil Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Shrikant Kaushik, Advocate.

For State : Shri Rahul Jha, Govt.

Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P.

Sam Koshy Order on Board 10 .05.2023 1.

The grievance of the petitioner seems to be the inaction on the part of the respondents in not paying compensation to the petitioner for the land belonging to the petitioner that situates at Khasra No.254/9, area 0.028 dismal at village Manikpur, Tehsil and District Bilaspur for the construction of Bilaspur-Urga Highway.

2.

Given the fact that the petitioner makes a statement that no compensation whatsoever has been paid to him, let the petitioner approach the respondent No.4 by making a detailed representation supported with all relevant records in respect of their grievance of non payment of the compensation.

Upon such representation being made, the Sub Divisional Officer shall duly scrutinize the same and take an appropriate decision within an outer limit of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.