Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

SABU GEORGE vs MUNDRA

Case NumberC/10151/2022
Date of Filing22 Mar 2022
Case Type--
Last Hearing29 Oct 2025
State--
City--
Year of Filing2022

Party Details

Petitioner
  • SABU GEORGE
Respondent
  • MUNDRA

Case Summary

SABU GEORGE filed Case No. C/10151/2022 in the CESTAT on 22 Mar 2022 against MUNDRA. The case has undergone 3 hearings over 1 month. The case is currently pending. 4 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (3)

  • 29OCT 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: Single Member SM1

    Adj

  • 24SEP 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: Single Member SM1

    Adj

  • 29OCT 2025
    Hearing

    Judge: Single Member SM1

    Adj

Orders (4)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

1 | P a g e Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad REGIONAL BENCH- COURT NO.

02 Customs Appeal No.

10151 of 2022 [Arising out of OIA-MUN-CUSTM-000-APP-283-21-22 dated 02/02/2022 passed by the Commissioner of CUSTOMS-AHMEDABAD] SABU GEORGE …..Appellant Power Of Attorney Holder And G Card Holder Lara Exim Pvt Ltd Nu-4 C-17 Sapana Nagar Gandhidham Kutch, Gujarat VERSUS C.C.-MUNDRA …..Respondent Office of the Principal Commissionerate of Customs, Port User Buld.

Custom House Mundra, Mundra Kutch, Gujarat-370421 APPEARANCE: Shri.Vijay N Thakkar, Consultant for the Appellant Ms.

Sunita Menon, Superintendent (AR) for the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.

SOMESH ARORA, MEMBER ( JUDICIAL ) Final Order No.

11041/2025_ DATE OF HEARING:12.11.2025 DATE OF DECISION:14.11.2025 SOMESH ARORA Matter was listed by the registry without any defect and argued by both sides.

1.

However, this Court has gone through the impugned order and finds that the penalties are imposed against M/s.

Lara Exim Pvt.

Ltd which is a corporate entity, both by the adjudicating authority as well as the appellate authority.

There is no specific penalty imposed as per the impugned order against Sabu George who has made this appeal as the authorized person and attorney holder of M/s.

Lara Exim Pvt., same is therefore not maintainable and is liable to be rejected.

2.

Appeal is therefore rejected accordingly. (Pronounced in the open court on 14.11.2025) (SOMESH ARORA) MEMBER ( JUDICIAL ) Prachi