SHRI ASHOK RAGHUVIRSING JAIN vs BHAVNAGAR
Party Details
- SHRI ASHOK RAGHUVIRSING JAIN
- BHAVNAGAR
Case Summary
SHRI ASHOK RAGHUVIRSING JAIN filed Case No. E/10873/2019 in the CESTAT on 13 May 2019 against BHAVNAGAR. The case has undergone 4 hearings over 9 months. The case was disposed of on 12 Jan 2021. 2 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (4)
- 23MAR 2020Hearing
Judge: Antidumping3
Adj
- 12JAN 2021Hearing
Judge: Antidumping3
Stay INFRUCTUOUS
- 12JAN 2021Hearing
Judge: Antidumping3
Stay INFRUCTUOUS
Orders (2)
- 12JAN 2021judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 18JUN 2019orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, WEST ZONAL BENCH : AHMEDABAD REGIONAL BENCH - COURT NO.
3 Excise Appeal No.
10873 of 2019 [Arising out of Order-in-Original/Appeal No BHV-EXCUS-000-APP-321-324-2018-19 dated 17/12/2018 passed by Commissioner ( Appeals ) Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax-RAJKOT] Shri Ashok Raghuvirsing Jain M/s Akansha Ship Breaking Pvt Ltd BHAVNAGAR GUJARAT ….
Appellant Versus C.C.E. & S.T.-Bhavnagar PLOT NO.6776/B-1...SIDDHI SADAN, NARAYAN UPADHYAY MARG, BESIDE GANDHI CLINIC, NEAR PARIMIAL CHOWK, BHAVNAGAR, GUJARAT- 364001 ....
Respondent APPEARANCE : Shri Sarju Mehta, C.A. for the Appellant Shri H.K.
Jain, Assistant Commissioner (Authorised Representative) for the Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR.
RAMESH NAIR, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) HON’BLE MR.
RAJU, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) FINAL ORDER NO.
A/10017 / 2021 DATE OF HEARING/ DECISION : 12 January,2021 RAMESH NAIR The appellant filed a request letter to withdraw this appeal as they have opted to avail the “Sabka Vishwas” (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.
2.
Shri Sarju Mehta, Learned Chartered Accountant appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the case has been settled under the above said scheme and the appellant has submitted SVLDR-1 & SVLDR-4 Certificates therefore, he seeks withdrawal of appeal.
3.
Shri H.K.
Jain, Learned Superintendent (Authorized Representative) has no objection in disposal of the appeal as withdrawn.
4.
In view of the above position, we dismiss the appeal as withdrawn. (Dictated and pronounced in the open court) (Ramesh Nair) Member (Judicial) (Raju) Member (Technical) Diksha