Meta Pixel
CNR: --
DISPOSED

KANA REAL ESTATE PVT LTD vs VADODARA-I

Case NumberST/11367/2017
Date of Filing14 Jul 2017
Case Type--
Last Hearing3 Dec 2020
State--
City--
Year of Filing2017

Party Details

Petitioner
  • KANA REAL ESTATE PVT LTD
Respondent
  • VADODARA-I

Case Summary

KANA REAL ESTATE PVT LTD filed Case No. ST/11367/2017 in the CESTAT on 14 Jul 2017 against VADODARA-I. The case has undergone 2 hearings over 1 day. The case was disposed of on 3 Dec 2020. 1 order has been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (2)

  • 3DEC 2020
    Hearing

    Judge: Antidumping3

    Stay INFRUCTUOUS

  • 3DEC 2020
    Hearing

    Judge: Antidumping3

    Stay INFRUCTUOUS

Orders (1)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad REGIONAL BENCH- COURT NO.3 Service Tax Appeal No.11367 of 2017 (Arising out of OIO-VAD-EXCUS-001-COM-002-17-18 dated 18/04/2017 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax-VADODARA-I) Kana Real Estate Pvt Ltd ………Appellant C-3, Sardar Estate, Ajwa Road, Vadodara, Gujarat VERSUS C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-I ………Respondent 1st Floor...Central Excise Building, Race Course Circle, Vadodara,Gujarat-390007 APPEARANCE: Shri Keyur P Sheth, Advocate for the Appellant Shri Vinod Lukose, Superintendent (AR) for the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MEMBER (JUDICIAL), MR.

RAMESH NAIR HON'BLE MEMBER (TECHNICAL), MR.

RAJU Final Order No.

A/ 11351 /2020 DATE OF HEARING: 03.12.2020 DATE OF DECISION:03.12.2020 RAMESH NAIR The appellant filed a request letter to withdraw this appeal as they have opted to avail the “Sabka Vishwas” (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.

2.

Shri Keyur P Sheth, Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the case has been settled under the above said scheme and the appellant has submitted SVLDR-1 & SVLDR-4 Certificates therefore, he seeks withdrawal of appeal.

3.

Shri Vinod Lukose, Learned Superintendent (Authorized Representative) has no objection in disposal of the appeal as withdrawn.

4.

In view of the above position, we dismiss the appeal as withdrawn. (Dictated & Pronounced in the open court) (RAMESH NAIR) MEMBER (JUDICIAL) (RAJU) MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Mehul