Meta Pixel
CNR: --
PENDING

COURTYARD vs JABALPUR

Case NumberST/50148/2019
Date of Filing18 Jan 2019
Case Type--
Last Hearing24 May 2023
State--
City--
Year of Filing2019

Party Details

Petitioner
  • COURTYARD
Respondent
  • JABALPUR

Case Summary

COURTYARD filed Case No. ST/50148/2019 in the CESTAT on 18 Jan 2019 against JABALPUR. The case has undergone 2 hearings over 1 day. The case is currently pending. 5 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (2)

  • 24MAY 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: Customs Division Bench1

    Adj

  • 24MAY 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: Customs Division Bench1

    Adj

Orders (5)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI PRINCIPAL BENCH- COURT NO.

I Service Tax Appeal No.

50148 of 2019 (Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No.

BHO-EXCUS-001-APP-253&254-18-19 dated 29.10.2018 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), CGST, Customs & Central Excise, Bhopal) Courtyard .…Appellant Village Patpara Near Kanha National Park Distt.

Mandla Versus Commissioner of Central Goods ....Respondent And Service Tax, Customs And Excise, Jabalpur APPEARANCE: Mr.

Himanshu Khurana , Advocate for the Appellant Shri S.K.

Meena, Authorized Representative for the Department CORAM: HON’BLE MR.

JUSTICE DILIP GUPTA, PRESIDENT HON’BLE MR.

P.V.

SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Date of Hearing/ Decision: August 10, 2023 FINAL ORDER NO.

51055/2023 JUSTICE DILIP GUPTA After the matter had been heard for some time, Shri Himanshu Khemuka, learned counsel appearing for the appellant has stated that the appellant does not desire to press the appeal as the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) has merely remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for a fresh disposal after providing adequate opportunity.

He however, states that some reasonable time may be granted to the Adjudicating Authority to pass a final order.

2.

Learned authorized representative Shri S.K.

Meena appearing for the Department states that subject to the appellant cooperating in the 2 hearing before the Adjudicating Authority, the Adjudicating Authority shall make all endeavors to decide the matter expeditiously.

3.

In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed but with an observation that subject to the appellant submitting the requisite documents before the Adjudicating Authority within a period of one month from today, the Adjudicating Authority shall make all endeavors to decide the appeal expeditiously and preferably within a further period of three months. (Order dictated in the Open Court) (JUSTICE DILIP GUPTA) PRESIDENT (P.V.

SUBBA RAO) MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Sb