A V NAGESHWAR RAO (M) , vs PRASAR BHARTI (M) ,

OA/536/2021 Page 1 of 3 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH OA/021/536/2021 HYDERABAD, this the 18th day of August, 2021 Hon’ble Mr.

Ashish Kalia, Judl.

Member Hon’ble Mr.

N.

Neihsial, Admn.

Member A.V.

Nageshwar Rao, S/o.

A.

Manohar, Aged about 52 years, Occ: Makeup Artist, Gr.

C, Doordarshan Kendra Hyderabad, Cell:8919345392, e.mail:[email protected]. ...Applicant (By Advocate: Sri M.V.

Praveen Kumar) Vs.

1.

The Union of India rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, Room No.655, A-Wing, Shastry Bhavan, New Delhi – 110 001.

2.

Prasar Bharathi rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, Doordarshan Bhavan, Mandi House, Copernicus Marg, New Delhi – 110 001.

3.

The Director General, Doordarshan Bhavan, Mandi House, Copernicus Marg, New Delhi – 110 001.

4.

The Additional Director General (A), South Zone, Swamy Sivananda Sali, Chennai – 600 005.

5.

The Deputy Director General, Head of the Office, Doordarshan Kendra, Hyderabad at Ramanthapur – 500 013. ...Respondents (By Advocate: Sri A.

Radha Krishna, Sr.

PC for CG) --- OA/536/2021 Page 2 of 3 ORAL ORDER (As per Hon’ble Mr.

Member) Through Video Conferencing: Heard Sri M.V.

Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri A.

Radha Krishna, learned Senior Panel Counsel for the respondents.

The applicant has been working as Make-up Artist since 2015.

On his request, he has been transferred to Hyderabad in the year of 2018.

Now, the applicant is again transferred to Kerala.

He is feeling aggrieved by the said order and approached this Tribunal for redressal of his grievance only on the following two counts: i) His transfer is against the transfer policy, which says that one should not be transferred before completion of four years. ii) His girl child is studying in Class XI and in the midst of the academic session, he should not be transferred.

He made a detailed representation on 16/08/2021, which is stated to be pending.

Sri A.

Radhakrishna, learned Senior Panel Counsel put appearance.

He opposed this application and further submitted that transfer is a incidence of service and so on.

OA/536/2021 Page 3 of 3 4.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of this view that this Original Application can be disposed of at the admission stage, with the direction to the respondents that they may take a call on applicant’s representation dated 16.08.2021 and shall decide the same within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Till then, the applicant should not be disturbed from the present place of posting.

With the above observation, the OA is disposed of at the admission stage.

In case any grievance is still not met with, the applicant may re- approach this Tribunal.

No order as to costs. (N.

NEIHSIAL) (ASHISH KALIA) ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER /al/