PANDI BUGGAMMA (M) , vs SURVEY OF INDIA (M) ,
Party Details
- PANDI BUGGAMMA (M)
- SURVEY OF INDIA (M)
Case Summary
PANDI BUGGAMMA (M) filed Case No. O.A./601/2020 in the CAT on 4 Sept 2020 against SURVEY OF INDIA (M). The case has undergone 2 hearings over 1 month. The case was disposed of on 24 Aug 2021. 2 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (2)
- 24AUG 2021FINAL HEARING (2015 TO 2020 CASES - NO ADJOURNMENT)
Judge: N/A
Stage: DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
- 16JUL 2021FOR REPLY STATEMENT
Judge: N/A
Stage: FOR REPLY
Orders (2)
- 24AUG 2021judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 24AUG 2021orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
OA/601/2020 Page 1 of 2 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH OA/021/601/2020 HYDERABAD, this the 24th day of August, 2021 Hon’ble Mr.
Ashish Kalia, Judl.
Member 1.
Pandi Buggamma, W/o.
Late Lakshmaiah, Aged about 75 years, Occ: Nil, Gr.
C, R/o.
Arutla Village, Manchal Mandal, R.R.
District.
2.
Pandi Prem Kumar @ Kumar, S/o.
Late Pandi Ramulu, Aged about 30 years, R/o.
District. ...Applicants (By Advocate: Sri K.
Venkateswarlu) Vs.
1.
The Union of India rep. by its Secretary, Minister of Science & Technology, Department of Survey of India, New Delhi.
The Director, Survey of India, Southern Printing Group, Uppal, Hyderabad – 500 039.
3.
The Administrative Officer, Survey of India, Southern Printing Group, Uppal, Hyderabad – 500 039.
4.
Smt.
Budda Muthamma @ Vijayalakshmi, W/o.
Budda Shankaraiah, Aged 45 years, R/o.
Kappa Village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, R.R.
District, Presently Residing At H.No.5-38, Sainagar, Road No.4, Nagole Village, Uppal, Hyderabad. ...Respondents (By Advocate: Sri V.
Vinod Kumar, Sr.
CGSC ) OA/601/2020 Page 2 of 2 ORAL ORDER (As per Hon’ble Mr.
Member) Through Video Conferencing: Sri V.
Vinod Kumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel appeared on behalf of the respondents.
However, even on the revised call, there is no representation on behalf of the applicant.
It indicates that the applicant as well as his counsel lost interest in prosecuting the matter further.
Hence, the Original Application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
There shall be no order as to costs. (ASHISH KALIA) JUDICIAL MEMBER /pv/