P NAGESH (M) , vs INDIAN NATIONAL CENTRE FOR OCEAN INFORMATION SERVICES HYDERABAD (M) , EARTH SCIENCES , EARTH SCIENCES , EARTH SCIENCES ,

O.A.

No.

330/00438/2021 Page 1 of 2 Open Court CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH ALLAHABAD.

Dated : This the 05th day of July 2021 Hon’ble Justice Mrs.

Vijay Lakshmi, Member (Judicial) Hon’ble Mr.

Devendra Chaudhry, Member (Administrative) Original Application No.

330/00438/2021 Ravi Prakash, a/a 29 years, son of Sri Shiv Prakash, Resident of near Railway Crossing, Ghurma, Gohara, Gurma Markundi, Sonebhadra, Uttar Pradesh-231209.

At present posted on the post of Key Man in Gang Number 15, Agori Khas Railway Station, Sonebhadra under the Sr.

Section Engineer (Track), North Central Railway, Churk, Sonebhadra. . . .Applicant By Adv : Shri Satish Dwivedi V E R S U S 1.

Union of India through the General Manager, North Central Railway, Head Quarter Office, Allahabad.

2.

The Divisional Railway Manager, North Central Railway, Allahabad Division, Allahabad.

3.

The Assistant Divisional Engineer, North Central Railway, Chunar.

4.

The Sr.

Section Engineer (Track), North Central Railway, Churk. . . .Respondents By Adv: Shri Shesh Mani Mishra O R D E R Delivered by Hon’ble Justice Mrs.

Vijay Lakshmi, Member (J) We have joined this Division Bench online through video conferencing.

Shri Satish Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri S.M.

Mishra, learned counsel, who has received advance notice on behalf of the respondents, both have appeared online through video conferencing.

Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the record available before us in pdf.

330/00438/2021 Page 2 of 2 4.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant will be satisfied at this stage, if his representation dated 13.03.2021 (Annexure A-5 of OA) pending before the respondent no.

3 is decided by the respondent concerned, who is the competent authority, by a reasoned and speaking order in a time bound manner.

5. manner.

5.

Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection against the limited prayer made by the applicant’s counsel.

6.

In view of limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant, no useful purpose will be served in keeping this OA pending and it is disposed of finally at the admission stage, with direction to the respondent concerned , who is the competent authority, to decide the representation of the applicant dated 13.03.2021 (Annexure A-5) by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

7.

The order so passed, shall be communicated to the applicant by the respondents without any delay.

8.

The OA is accordingly disposed off at the admission stage.

9.

It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. (Devendra Chaudhry) (Justice Vijay Lakshmi) Member (Administrative) Member (Judicial) Anand...