Meta Pixel
CNR: O.A./1558/2015
DISPOSED

V D Raj Kumar (M) , vs M/O RAILWAYS (M) ,

Case NumberO.A./1558/2015
Date of Filing16 Nov 2015
Case TypeO.A.
Last Hearing28 Mar 2023
State--
City--
Year of Filing2015

Party Details

Petitioner
  • V D Raj Kumar (M)
Respondent
  • M/O RAILWAYS (M)

Case Summary

V D Raj Kumar (M) filed Case No. O.A./1558/2015 in the CAT on 16 Nov 2015 against M/O RAILWAYS (M). The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of on 28 Mar 2023. 2 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (1)

  • 28MAR 2023
    FINAL HEARING (2015 TO 2020 CASES - NO ADJOURNMENT)

    Judge: N/A

    Stage: CLOSED

Orders (2)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

OA/1558/2015 Page 1 of 2 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH OA/021/1558/2015 HYDERABAD, this the 28th day of March, 2023 Hon’ble Mr.

SudhiRanjan Mishra, Judicial Member Hon’ble Mr.

B.

Anand, Administrative Member V.D.

Raja Kumar, S/o.

Sri V.

Devadas, Aged about 53 years, Occ: TGT/RHS/EM/DKJ, Working at 1st Floor, C-Block, Railway Recruitment Cell, Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad.

R/o.

H.No.

1-136, Sri Sai Homes, Phase-II, Gurramguda(PO), Saroornagar(M), R.R.

District. ....

Applicant. (By Advocate : Mr.

Jaya Prakash Babu) Vs.

1.

Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Railways, Railway Board, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi.

2.

The Deputy Chief Personnel Officer(Welfare), O/o.

The Chief Personnel Officer, Headquarters Office, Personnel Department, Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad.

3.

The Divisional Railway Manager, Personnel Branch, South Central Railway, 4th Floor, Sanchalan Bhavan, Secunderabad.

4.

The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Secunderabad Division, South Central Railway, Sanchalan Bhavan, Secunderabad. ...

Respondents (By Advocate: Mr.

V Vinod Kumar, Sr.PC for CG) OA/1558/2015 Page 2 of 2 --- ORAL ORDER (As per Hon’ble Mr.

Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, Judicial Member) Mr.

G Jaya Prakash Babu, learned counsel for the applicant.

Mr.

V Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents.

Both the counsel have submitted across the bar that the relief sought for by the applicant in the OA has been granted by the respondents and the OA may be closed.

In view of the above, the OA is closed.

There shall be no order as to costs. (B.

ANAND) (SUDHI RANJAN MISHRA) ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER JUDICIALMEMBER /Ram/