CHANDAN SINGH (M) , vs DEPT OF ATOMIC ENERGY (M) ,
Party Details
- CHANDAN SINGH (M)
- DEPT OF ATOMIC ENERGY (M)
Case Summary
CHANDAN SINGH (M) filed Case No. M.A./462/2022 in the CAT on 8 Aug 2022 against DEPT OF ATOMIC ENERGY (M). The case has undergone 2 hearings over 29 days. The case was disposed of on 12 Apr 2023. 3 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (2)
- 12APR 2023MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION
Judge: N/A
Stage: DISMISSED
- 14MAR 2023REVIEW APPLICATION
Judge: N/A
Stage: ADJOURNED WITH DIRECTIONS
Orders (3)
- 12APR 2023judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 12APR 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 14MAR 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
MA/462/2022 & RASR/599/2021 Page 1 of 2 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH MA No.
462/2022 in RASR No.
599/2021 in OA No.
611/2020 & RASR No.
611/2020 HYDERABAD, this the 12th day of April, 2023 Hon’ble Mr.
Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, Judl.
Member Hon’ble Mr.
B.
Anand, Admn.
Member Chandan Singh, S/o.
Birender Singh, Aged about 33 years, Occ: Unemployee, R/o.
H.No.
GE-3, City Centre, Bokarao Street City, Jharkhand. ...Applicant. (By Advocate: Mr.
P Nagabhushanam) Vs.
1.
Union of India, Rep. by the Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy, Anushakti Bhavan, CSM Marg, Mumbai.
2.
The Chief Commissioner, Court of Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities, Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, Department of Disability Affair, Shastry Bhavan, New Delhi.
3.
The Chief Executive Officer, Nuclear Fuel Complex, Department of Atomic Energy, ECIL, Moula Ali, Hyderabad.
4.
The General Manager, Nuclear Fuel Complex, Department of Atomic Energy, ECIL, Moula Ali, Hyderabad.
5.
The Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Nuclear Fuel Complex, Department of Atomic Energy, ECIL, Moula Ali, Hyderabad.
6.
The Assistant Personnel Officer, Nuclear Fuel Complex, Department of Atomic Energy, ECIL, Moula Ali, Hyderabad. ...
Respondents. (By Advocate: Mr.
V Vinod Kumar, Sr.PC for CG).
MA/462/2022 & RASR/599/2021 Page 2 of 2 --- ORAL ORDER (As per Hon’ble Mr.
Member) None appeared on behalf of the applicant..
Mr.
V Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents.
MA/462/2022 is filed by the applicant in OA for condonation of delay of 441 days in filing the review application.
Neither the applicant nor his counsel is present today.
It indicates that the applicant as well as his counsel lost interest in prosecuting the matter further. r further.
Further, in terms of Section 17(1) of the Central Administrative Tribunal(Procedure) Rules, 1987, ‘no application for review shall be entertained unless it is filed within thirty days from the date of receipt of copy of the order sought to be reviewed’.
This Tribunal has no power to condone the delay in filing review application.
In view of the above, MA/462/2022 is dismissed.
Accordingly, RASR No.599/2021 is rejected. (B ANAND) (SUDHI RANJAN MISHRA) MEMBER(A) MEMBER(J) /Ram./