P Narasimha Murthy (M) , vs M/O DEFENCE (M) ,
Party Details
- P Narasimha Murthy (M)
- M/O DEFENCE (M)
Case Summary
P Narasimha Murthy (M) filed Case No. O.A./1343/2015 in the CAT on 8 Oct 2015 against M/O DEFENCE (M). The case has undergone 3 hearings over 1 month. The case was disposed of on 30 Mar 2023. 4 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (3)
- 30MAR 2023FINAL HEARING (2015 TO 2020 CASES - NO ADJOURNMENT)
Judge: N/A
Stage: CLOSED
- 14MAR 2023FINAL HEARING (2015 TO 2020 CASES - NO ADJOURNMENT)
Judge: N/A
Stage: ADJOURNED WITH DIRECTIONS
- 8FEB 2023FINAL HEARING (2015 TO 2020 CASES - NO ADJOURNMENT)
Judge: N/A
Stage: ADJOURNED WITH DIRECTIONS
Orders (4)
- 30MAR 2023judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 30MAR 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 14MAR 2023orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
OA/1343/2015 Page 1 of 2 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH OA/021/1343/2015 HYDERABAD, this the 30th day of March, 2023 Hon’ble Mr.
Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, Judicial Member Hon’ble Mr.
B.
Anand, Administrative Member P.
Narasimha Murthy, S/o.
Eswara Rao, Aged about 30 years, OBC, Occ: Unemployee, R/o.
D.No.1-42, Saripalli, Pendurthy, Visakhapatnam- 531 173. ....
Applicant. (By Advocate : Mrs.
Anita Swain) Vs.
1.
The Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Defence, South Block, New Delhi- 110 011.
2.
The Chief of Naval Staff, Integrated Headquarters of Ministry of Defence(Navy), South Block, New Delhi- 110 011.
3.
The Flag Officer Commanding in Chief, (For CRC), Headquarter, Eastern Naval Command, Naval Base, Visakhapatnam. ...
Respondents (By Advocate: Mrs.
K Rajitha, Sr.
PC for CG) ---- OA/1343/2015 Page 2 of 2 ORAL ORDER (As per Hon’ble Mr.
Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, Judicial.
Member) Mrs.
Anita Swain, learned counsel for the applicant 2.
Mrs.
K Rajitha, learned counsel for the respondents.
The respondents’ counsel has submitted that the main prayer of the applicant in this OA is to issue call letter/hall ticket for appearing in the written examination on par with other candidates.
As per the direction of this Tribunal dt.
08.10.2015, the applicant was issued hall ticket and allowed to participate in the written examination.
The relief sought for by the applicant in the OA has been granted.
She prayed to dismiss this OA.
4.
Having heard both the counsel, as the main relief of issuing hall ticket to appear in the written examination has already been granted to the applicant, this OA has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the OA is dismissed as infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs. (B.
ANAND) (SUDHI RANJAN MISHRA) ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER /Ram/