NAROTTAM PRADHAN (M) , vs INDIAN COUNCIL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH (M) ,
Party Details
- NAROTTAM PRADHAN (M)
- INDIAN COUNCIL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH (M)
Case Summary
NAROTTAM PRADHAN (M) filed Case No. O.A./111/2021 in the CAT on 12 Feb 2021 against INDIAN COUNCIL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH (M). The case has undergone 11 hearings over 1 year and 2 months. The case was disposed of on 4 Nov 2022. 17 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (11)
- 18OCT 2022FOR ADMISSION
Judge: N/A
Stage: CAV
- 4NOV 2022FOR PRONOUNCEMENT
Judge: N/A
Stage: DISMISSED
- 11OCT 2022FOR ADMISSION
Judge: N/A
Stage: ADJOURNED WITH DIRECTIONS
Orders (17)
- 4NOV 2022judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 4NOV 2022orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 18OCT 2022orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
OA/111/2021 Page 1 of 2 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH OA/021/111/2021 HYDERABAD, this the 25th day of October, 2021 Hon’ble Mr.
Ashish Kalia, Judl.
Member Hon’ble Mr.
B V Sudhakar, Admn.
Member Narottam Pradhan, S/o K.C.
Pradhan, Aged about 49 years, working as Technical Officer-B, ICMR-NIN, Jamai-Osmania PO, Hyderabad- 500 007, R/o Flat NO.
202, Sri Balaji Nivas, Sainagar, Kushaiguda, Hyderabad. ...
Applicant. (By Advocate : Mr.
T P Acharya) Vs.
1.
Union of India, Represented by its Director General, Indian Council of Medical Research, V.Ramalingaswamy Bhavan, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi- 110 029.
2.
National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Jamai-Osmania P.O., Hyderabad- 500 007, Represented by its Director.
3.
National Animal Resource Facility for Biomedical Research(NARF-BR), At Biotech Park, Genome Valley, Turkapalli, Kolthur Post, Shamirpet, Hyderabad- 500 101, Rep. by its Director. ...
Respondents (By Advocate: Mr.
B N Sharma, SC for NIN) --- OA/111/2021 Page 2 of 2 ORAL ORDER (As per Hon’ble Mr.
Member) Through Video Conferencing: None present on behalf of the applicant.
Mr.
B N Sharma, learned counsels for the respondents.
Neither the applicant nor his counsel is present today.
It indicates that the applicant as well as his counsel lost interest in prosecuting the matter further.
Hence, the Original Application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
There shall be no order as to costs. (B.V.
SUDHAKAR) (ASHISH KALIA) ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER /Ram./