L V PRASAD (M) , vs M/O HOME AFFAIRS (M) ,
Party Details
- L V PRASAD (M)
- M/O HOME AFFAIRS (M)
Case Summary
L V PRASAD (M) filed Case No. O.A./262/2021 in the CAT on 24 Mar 2021 against M/O HOME AFFAIRS (M). The case has undergone 18 hearings over 4 years and 2 months. The case was disposed of on 18 Mar 2026. 20 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (18)
- 18MAR 2026FINAL HEARING (2015 TO 2020 CASES - NO ADJOURNMENT)
Judge: N/A
Stage: ADJOURNED WITH DIRECTIONS
- 28JAN 2026FINAL HEARING (2015 TO 2020 CASES - NO ADJOURNMENT)
Judge: N/A
Stage: ADJOURNED WITH DIRECTIONS
- 11DEC 2025FINAL HEARING (2015 TO 2020 CASES - NO ADJOURNMENT)
Judge: N/A
Stage: ADJOURNED WITH DIRECTIONS
Orders (20)
- 28JAN 2026orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 11DEC 2025orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 5DEC 2025orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
OA/262/2021 Page 1 of 2 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH OA/020/262/2021 HYDERABAD, this the 6th day of January, 2022 Hon’ble Mr.
Ashish Kalia, Judl.
Member Hon’ble Mr.
B.V.
Sudhakar, Admn.
Member L.V.
Prasad, IPS (AGMU..1997), 49 years, S/o.
Shri L.
Narasimham, C/o.
Smt.
T.V.
Padmavathi Garu, D.No.35-3-69 (55/2), CRP Quarters Road, ONGOLE, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh – 523 001. ...Applicant (By Advocate : Sri P.V.
Krishnaiah) Vs.
1.
Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001.
2.
The Director (Services), Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001.
3.
Shri Vishwapati Trivedi, IAS (Retd.), Inquiry Authority, Raghunath Bhavan, 7, Spring Lane, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi – 110 070. ...
Respondents (By Advocate: Sri V.
Vinod Kumar, Sr.
CGSC) OA/262/2021 Page 2 of 2 ORAL ORDER (As per Hon’ble Mr.
Member) Through Video Conferencing: Sri V.
Vinod Kumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel represented the respondents.
There is no representation on behalf of the respondents.
Even on 05.01.2022, there was no representation on behalf of the applicant.
It indicates that neither the applicant nor his counsel is interested in prosecuting the matter.
Hence, the O.A. is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim Order already passed is hereby vacated.
No order as to costs. (B.V.
SUDHAKAR) (ASHISH KALIA) ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER /pv/