Mushtaq Ahmed (M) , vs DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION UT OF J&K (M) ,
Party Details
- Mushtaq Ahmed (M)
- DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION UT OF J&K (M)
Case Summary
Mushtaq Ahmed (M) filed Case No. T.A./1808/2020 in the CAT on 29 Sept 2020 against DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION UT OF J&K (M). The case has undergone 5 hearings over 11 months. The case was disposed of on 4 Oct 2021. 3 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (5)
- 4OCT 2021FOR DIRECTION (APPEARANCE)
Judge: N/A
- 5AUG 2021AFTER NOTICE(i.e. NOT READY FOR HEARING)
Judge: N/A
- 12JUL 2021AFTER NOTICE(i.e. NOT READY FOR HEARING)
Judge: N/A
Orders (3)
- 4OCT 2021judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 12JUL 2021orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 10MAY 2021orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
:: 1 :: T.A.
No.
61/1431/2020 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JAMMU BENCH, JAMMU Hearing through video conferencing T.A.
61/1431/2020 This the 4th day of October, 2021 HON’BLE MR.
RAKESH SAGAR JAIN, MEMBER (J) HON’BLE MR.
ANAND MATHUR, MEMBER (A) Mohd Qayoom Khan, Age 36 years S/o Sher Mohd Khan R/o Village Plera, Tehsil Mandi District Poonch. ..........................Applicant (Advocate:- Mr.Arshid Pervaiz) Versus 1.
Union of India through Home Secretary, South Block, New Delhi.
2.
Director, Intelligence Bureau, North Block, New Delhi.
3.
Additional Director, Intelligence Bureau, C/o 56 APO Srinagar (J&K).
4.
Additional Deputy Director, Intelligence Bureau, 16-A, Rail Road Complex, Near Railway Station, Jammu (J&K).
5.
Assistant Central Intelligence Officer, Intelligence Bureau (MHA), Mandi/Poonch. ........................Respondents. (Advocate: Mr.Raghu Mehta, SCGSC) O R D E R [O R A L] (Delivered by Hon’ble Mr.
Rakesh Sagar Jain, Member-J) At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant would be satisfied, if a direction is issued to the respondents to treat this T.A. as representation preferred by the applicant and take a decision on the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a limited time frame. :: 2 :: T.A.
61/1431/2020 2.
We have heard Mr.Arshid Pervaiz, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.
Raghu Mehta, SCGSC for the respondents and perused the records.
Looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant, we dispose of the T.A. with direction to the respondents to treat this T.A. as representation preferred by the applicant and take a decision on the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
It is made clear that we have not entered into the merits of the case.
No order as to costs. (ANAND MATHUR) (RAKESH SAGAR JAIN) MEMBER (A) MEMBER (J) /kdr/