Meta Pixel
CNR: T.A./657/2021
DISPOSED

Sikander Singh (M) , vs D/O CIVIL SECRETARIAT, J& K (M) ,

Case NumberT.A./657/2021
Date of Filing8 Jan 2021
Case TypeT.A.
Last Hearing27 Jul 2021
State--
City--
Year of Filing2021

Party Details

Petitioner
  • Sikander Singh (M)
Respondent
  • D/O CIVIL SECRETARIAT
  • J& K (M)

Case Summary

Sikander Singh (M) filed Case No. T.A./657/2021 in the CAT on 8 Jan 2021 against D/O CIVIL SECRETARIAT and J& K (M). The case has undergone 4 hearings over 5 months. The case was disposed of on 27 Jul 2021. 3 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (4)

  • 27JUL 2021
    AFTER NOTICE(i.e. NOT READY FOR HEARING)

    Judge: N/A

  • 26JUL 2021
    AFTER NOTICE(i.e. NOT READY FOR HEARING)

    Judge: N/A

  • 12JUL 2021
    AFTER NOTICE(i.e. NOT READY FOR HEARING)

    Judge: N/A

  • 12FEB 2021
    FRESH T.A.

    Judge: N/A

Orders (3)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

1 TA No.

657/2021 Item No.16 Central Administrative Tribunal Jammu Bench, Jammu T.A.

No.

657/2021 (SWP No.

345/2015) Tuesday, this the 27th day of July, 2021 (Through Video Conferencing) Hon’ble Mr.

Justice L.

Narasimha Reddy, Chairman Hon’ble Mr.

Mohd.

Jamshed, Member (A) 1.

Sikander Singh, Age 50 Years S/o Sh.

Pritam Singh R/o H.

293/4, Shastri Nagar Tehsil and District Jammu 2.

Nar Singh Dass, Age 55 Years S/o Late Sh.

Tola Ram R/o , Jasrota Tehsil and District Kathua 3.

Ashwani Kumar, Age 49 Years S/o Sh.

Nasib Singh R/o , Rehian Tehsil and District Samba 4.

Yousaf, Age 50 Years S/o Late Sh.

Shoker Din R/o H.

AP 307, Talab Khadika Tehsil and District Jammu 5.

Iqbal Bakshi, Age 45 Years S/o Late Sh.

Abdul Gani R/o ,Umer Mohalla Tehsil and District Kishatwar 6.

Makhan Singh, Age 46 Years S/o Sh.

Kartar Singh R/o ,Kandoli Tehsil Nagrota District Jammu 7.

Gurnam Singh, Age 48 Years S/o Sh.

Amar Singh R/o Batote District Ramban 8.

Romesh Singh, Age 55 Years 2 TA No.

657/2021 Item No.16 S/o Sh.

Paras Ram Bhahu R/o , Pallanwala Tehsil Akhnoor District Jammu 9.

Kavinder Pal Singh, Age 45 Years S/o Sh.S.

Khushwant Singh R/o , Channi Rama Tehsil and District Jammu 10.

Rohit Kumar, Age 40 Years S/o Late Sh.

Chander Mohan R/o , Channi Himmat, Tehsil and District Jammu 11.

Dinish Singh, Age 43 Years S/o Sh.

Bhagwan Singh R/o , Nagrota District Jammu …Applicants (Ms.

Meenakshi Slathia, Advocate) Versus 1.

State of J&K Through Its Chief Secretary Govt. of J&K Civil Secretariat, Jammu/ Srinagar 2.

Principal Secretary to Government General Administration Department Govt. of J&K, Civil Secretariat Jammu/ Srinagar 3.

Commissioner Secretary to Government Transport Department Govt. of J&K, Civil Secretariat Jammu/ Srinagar 4.

Transport Commissioner Jammu and Kashmir Rail Head Complex, Jammu 5.

Managing Director J&K State Road Transport Corporation Jammu 6.

Regional Transport Officer, Jammu 7.

Regional Transport Officer 3 TA No.

657/2021 Item No.

1 Item No.16 Kathua, Head Office, Lakhanpur ...Respondents (Mr.

Sudesh Magotra, Deputy Advocate General) ORDER (ORAL) Mr.

Narasimha Reddy: The applicants were employed in different capacities in the Jammu & Kashmir State Road Transport Corporation (JKSRTC).

On 29.08.2009, they were sent on deputation to Transport Department of Jammu & Kashmir, to hold various posts.

They were sought to be repatriated to their parent organization, through an order dated 29.01.2015 passed by the Transport Commissioner, Jammu & Kashmir, the 3rd respondent.

Feeling aggrieved by the order of repatriation, the applicants filed SWP No.345/2015 before the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir.

2.

According to them, they were sent on deputation to the Transport Department at a time when new establishments were opened and they rendered service of more than half a decade, in that Department.

It is also stated that time and again, assurances were given for their permanent absorption and contrary to that, they are sought to be repatriated.

4 TA No.

657/2021 Item No.16 3.

The record discloses that the respondents did not file any counter affidavit.

4.

The Hon’ble High Court passed an interim order dated 13.02.2015, directing the respondents to maintain status quo, in respect of the applicants.

5.

The SWP has since been transferred to the Tribunal in view of reorganization of the State of Jammu & Kashmir and renumbered as T.A.

No.657/2021.

6.

Today, we heard the arguments of Ms.

Meenakshi Slathia, learned counsel for applicants and Mr.

Sudesh Magotra, learned Deputy Advocate General.

7.

The applicants joined the service of JKSRTC.

While they were serving in that organization, certain new offices were established in the Transport Department of the State, in the year 2009.

With a view to cope up with the work, the Government required the JKSRTC to depute some of the experienced officials.

It is in that process, that the applicants came to be sent on deputation to the Transport Department. epartment.

Though the initial deputation was for two years, they were continued beyond two years, obviously because the work existed.

5 TA No.

657/2021 Item No.16 8.

A perusal of the order dated 29.01.2015 discloses that the applicants are sought to be repatriated on account of the fact that some regular employments have taken place in the Transport Department.

Had it been a case where the Department did not have any vacancies and the applicants have become surplus, the scope of interference with the order of repatriation would have been very little.

Learned counsel for applicants has placed before us, a copy of circular dated 16.07.2021 issued by the Jammu & Kashmir Road Transport Corporation, which reads:- “Transport Department Civil Secretariat, vide above communication projected Requirement of following staff from JKRTC for their deputation to Motor Vehicle Department UT of J & K.

1.

Inspectors (Mechanical Engineers) 2.

Officials of Ministerial Cadre Accordingly, I am directed to request all Profit Centre Heads/Unit Officers to provide the list of desirous employees within a period of two days.” 9.

From this, it is evident that there is still a need of Inspectors (Mechanical Engineers) in the Transport Corporation and to meet the requirement, they approached the JKSRTC for deputation of the employees of the latter.

The applicants state that they intend to be absorbed in the Transport Department itself.

No prejudice will be caused to 6 TA No.

657/2021 Item No.16 the Department also if the applicants are considered for absorption.

On the strength of the interim order dated 13.02.2015 passed by the Hon’ble High Court, the applicants are continuing in the Transport Department itself, even by now.

10.

We, therefore, allow the T.A. and set aside the impugned order dated 29.01.2015.

We leave it open to the applicants to submit representations / applications, within six weeks from today, for their absorption in the Transport Department. epartment.

The third respondent, in turn, shall pass appropriate orders on such representations / applications, within two months thereafter.

Till such orders are passed, the applicants shall be continued in the existing positions.

There shall be no order as to costs. ( Mohd.

Jamshed ) ( Justice L.

Narasimha Reddy ) Member (A) Chairman July 27, 2021 /sunil/rk/daya/