SAHAB SINGH (M) , vs AIR FORCE STATION (M) ,
Party Details
- SAHAB SINGH (M)
- AIR FORCE STATION (M)
Case Summary
SAHAB SINGH (M) filed Case No. O.A./1110/2021 in the CAT on 20 Dec 2021 against AIR FORCE STATION (M). The case has had one hearing so far. The case was disposed of on 21 Dec 2021. 2 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (1)
- 21DEC 2021FRESH ADMISSION
Judge: N/A
Stage: ALLOWED
Orders (2)
- 21DEC 2021judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 21DEC 2021orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
O.A.
No.
330/01110/2021 1 Open Court CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD (This the 21th day of December, 2021) Hon’ble Mr.
Tarun Shridhar, Member (Administrative) Original Application No.330/01110/2021 Sahab Singh (PA No.
54165-K) aged about 61 years son of late Nathuram, resident of village- Bahadurpur, Post- Takha, District- Etawah. …………….Applicant By Advocate: Shri Chaturbhuj Dwivedi Versus 1.
Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Govt. of India, South Block, New Delhi.
2.
Principle Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension) Draupadi Ghat, Allahabad.
3.
AOC , 24, Equipment Depot, Air Force Station, Manauri, Allahabad.
4.
Officerr-Incharge (Civil Admn), Office of AOC, 24 Equipment Depot, Air Force Station, Manauri, Allahabad. ….. …………Respondents By Advocate: Shri Chakrapani Vatsyayan O R D E R Delivered by Hon’ble Mr.
Tarun Shridhar, Member (A) The applicant in this O.A. was appointed on 1.10.1983 under the respondents and retired on 30.06.2020 from the post of MTS from the office of AOC, 24 Equipment Depot, Air Force Station, Manauri, Allahabad, on reaching the age of superannuation, as it was last working day of his service.
He is aggrieved due to the reason that his requests for grant of one notional increment for the purpose of pensionary benefits, has not been acceded to by the respondents.
I have heard Shri Chaturbhuj Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Chakrapani Vatsyayan, learned counsel for respondents and perused the pleadings of the parties as well as the