H K Jain (M) , vs RAJARAMAN SECRETARY & ORS MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED (M) , ,
Party Details
- H K Jain (M)
- RAJARAMAN SECRETARY & ORS MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED (M)
Case Summary
H K Jain (M) filed Case No. C.P./154/2022 in the CAT on 22 Apr 2022 against RAJARAMAN SECRETARY & ORS MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED (M). The case has undergone 5 hearings over 5 months. The case was disposed of on 10 Nov 2022. 5 orders have been issued in this matter.
Hearing History (5)
- 10NOV 2022For Orders
Judge: N/A
Stage: CLOSED
- 29SEP 2022For Orders
Judge: N/A
Stage: ADJOURNED WITH DIRECTIONS
- 21SEP 2022For Orders
Judge: N/A
Stage: ADJOURNED WITH DIRECTIONS
Orders (5)
- 10NOV 2022judgementView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 29SEP 2022orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
- 21SEP 2022orderView Order ↗
Order No: N/A
Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗
1 Item No.
28 CP No.
154/2022 in OA No.4608/2015 CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH C.P.
No.
154/2022 in O.A.
4608/2015 This the 10th day of November, 2022 Hon’ble Mr.
Justice Ranjit Vasantrao More, Chairman Hon’ble Mr.
Mohd.
Jamshed, Member (A) Shri H.K.
Jain, Age 71 years S/o Late Shri U.S.
Jain Ex-Technical Supervisor Deptt. of Telecommunications R/o 313, Lane No.12, Senani Vihar Colony Telibag, Rae Barellie Road Lucknow. ..
Petitioner (By Advocate: Mr.
H.K.
Bajpai) Versus 1.
Shri Rajaraman Secretary Ministry of Telecommunications Deptt. of Telecommunication Sanchar Bhawan, New Delhi.
2.
Sh.
Ajay Kumar Nema The CMD MTNL Khurshid Lal Bhawan New Delhi.
3.
Arun Meena SDO (Phones), ITO KEN Exchange Old Connaught Place New Delhi. ..
Respondents (By Advocate: Mr.
Arun Sanwal) 2 Item No.
154/2022 in OA No.4608/2015 O R D E R (ORAL) Per Justice Ranjit Vasantrao More The order dated 11.12.2018 passed in O.A.
4608/2015 in respect of which the grievance of non- compliance was made in the present Contempt Petition, is now complied with by the respondents, which is evident from the order dated 06.07.2022 passed by the Manager (I.T.O.), Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited, New Delhi annexed at Annexure CPR-3 of the counter affidavit.
In the light of the above, we close the Contempt Petition.
Notice issued to the respondent No.3 is discharged.
Needless to mention that if the petitioner has any grievance against the aforesaid order dated 06.07.2022, he is at liberty to challenge the same by filing fresh proceedings, in accordance with law. (Mohd.
Jamshed) (Justice Ranjit Vasantrao More) Member (A) Chairman /jyoti/