Meta Pixel
CNR: 94/2021
PENDING

Tata Steel Limited (Merged entity of Tata Steel Long Products Limited) vs Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission(R-1)

Case NumberAPL-0000110/2021
Date of Filing1 Mar 2021
Case TypeAPL
Last Hearing17 Jul 2023
StateDelhi
CityDelhi
Year of Filing2021

Party Details

Petitioner
  • Tata Steel Limited (Merged entity of Tata Steel Long Products Limited)
Respondent
  • Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission(R-1)
  • Jharkhand Renewable Energy Development Agency (R-2)

Case Summary

Tata Steel Limited (Merged entity of Tata Steel Long Products Limited) filed Case No. APL-0000110/2021 in the APTEL on 1 Mar 2021 against Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission(R-1) and Jharkhand Renewable Energy Development Agency (R-2). The case has undergone 22 hearings over 2 years and 3 months. The case is currently pending. 44 orders have been issued in this matter.

Hearing History (22)

  • 17JUL 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 14JUL 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 22MAY 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 9MAY 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 28APR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 31MAR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 20MAR 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 6FEB 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 6JAN 2023
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 20DEC 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 6DEC 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 31OCT 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 14SEP 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 27JUL 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 5MAY 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 15MAR 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 24FEB 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 7FEB 2022
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 12JUL 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 26APR 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • 26MAR 2021
    Hearing

    Judge: N/A

  • Hearing

    Judge: N/A

Orders (44)

Judgement DetailsView full order PDF ↗

Before the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Appellate Jurisdiction) Appeal No.110 of 2007 Dated: February 26, 2008 Present: Hon’ble Mr.

Justice Anil Dev Singh, Chairperson Hon’ble Mr.

A.A.

Khan, Technical Member U.P.

Power Corporation Ltd. … Appellant (s) Versus UPERC & Anr. … Respondent (s) Counsel for the Appellant(s) : None Counse he Respondent (s) : l for t Mr.

Suresh Tripathi for UPERC ORDER There is no appearance on behalf of the appellant.

It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.

Even on February 11, 2008, no one appeared for the appellant.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. (A.A.

Khan) (Anil Dev Singh) Technical Member Chairperson Surekha/sunita