CLM security evaluation is not completed by confirming that a vendor holds SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications. Most enterprise CLM vendors hold one or both. The certifications are a starting point, not a conclusion. What they tell you depends on what type of certification it is, what scope it covers, how old it is, whether it has any noted exceptions, and whether the scope actually covers the systems and data handling practices that are relevant to your use case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Enterprise procurement teams that complete CLM security evaluation at the badge level, noting “SOC 2 yes, ISO 27001 yes”, and moving on, are accepting a vendor’s self-selected evidence of their security posture. The evaluation does not surface the questions that matter: whether the certification covers the data that will actually be processed, whether the controls operated effectively over time, and whether the vendor’s security practices meet the specific requirements of the Indian regulatory environment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This article explains what SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications mean in the context of CLM evaluation, how to interpret them correctly, and what the India-specific security requirements are that these global certifications do not automatically address.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
SOC 2 is a framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants that evaluates how a service organisation manages data against five Trust Services Criteria: Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This distinction is the first and most important thing to establish in a CLM security evaluation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
SOC 2 Type I<\/strong> is a point-in-time assessment. An auditor reviews the vendor’s security controls and confirms that they were designed and in place at a specific date. Type I tells you that controls existed on audit day. It does not tell you whether those controls worked over time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n SOC 2 Type II<\/strong> covers an extended audit period, typically six to twelve months. The auditor tests whether the controls actually operated effectively throughout that period. Type II is the meaningful certification for enterprise procurement purposes. A Type II report with a twelve-month audit period tells you that controls were in place and functional over an extended period of time, not just on a single day.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Always ask for SOC 2 Type II. If a vendor presents a Type I report, ask why they do not have Type II and what their timeline is for obtaining it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Security is the only mandatory criterion in a SOC 2 report. It covers protection against unauthorised access, both physical and logical. The other four criteria are included based on the vendor’s product scope and customer requirements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For a CLM platform, the criteria most relevant to your evaluation are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Security:<\/strong> Access controls, encryption, vulnerability management, and monitoring. This is mandatory and should be in every SOC 2 report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Confidentiality:<\/strong> Protection of information designated as confidential. For a CLM platform that stores commercially sensitive contracts, pricing terms, and negotiated provisions, confidentiality is directly relevant. Ask whether the vendor’s SOC 2 scope includes the Confidentiality criterion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Availability:<\/strong> System uptime and performance against defined commitments. If your enterprise depends on the CLM for time-sensitive contract workflows, availability is relevant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Privacy:<\/strong> Handling of personal information in accordance with the vendor’s stated privacy practices. If contracts stored in the CLM contain personal data of individuals, the Privacy criterion is relevant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A SOC 2 Type II report includes the auditor’s findings on each tested control. When controls did not operate as designed during the audit period, the report notes exceptions. These exceptions are the most important part of the report for procurement evaluation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n An exception in a SOC 2 report means that a control that was supposed to work did not work at some point during the audit period. The vendor’s response to the exception, and whether it has been remediated, should be requested and reviewed. A vendor with one or two exceptions in an otherwise clean report is not necessarily a red flag if the remediation was prompt and documented. A vendor with multiple exceptions across key security controls is providing evidence of systemic control weakness that the certification badge does not surface.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ask vendors specifically: are there any noted exceptions in your most recent SOC 2 Type II report? How have they been remediated?<\/p>\n\n\n\n A SOC 2 Type II report from two years ago is not current evidence of security posture. Security environments change: new vulnerabilities emerge, new system components are deployed, staff changes occur. An evaluation based on a two-year-old report is an evaluation of security posture that may no longer reflect the current state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ask when the most recent SOC 2 Type II audit period ended. Anything beyond twelve months ago should be followed up with a question about when the next audit is expected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ISO 27001 is an international standard for Information Security Management Systems published by the International Organization for Standardization. Where SOC 2 assesses specific security controls in a product or service, ISO 27001 certifies that the vendor’s organisation operates a systematic, risk-based approach to information security management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current version of the standard is ISO\/IEC 27001:2022, published in October 2022. The previous version, ISO\/IEC 27001:2013, was withdrawn, with the transition deadline passing on October 31, 2025. Vendors who hold a 2013 certification that has not been transitioned to the 2022 standard are holding a lapsed certification. Confirm that the vendor holds the 2022 version.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The 2022 update restructured the Annex A controls from 114 controls across 14 domains to 93 controls across 4 themes: Organisational (37 controls), People (8 controls), Physical (14 controls), and Technological (34 controls). New controls were added covering cloud security, data masking, information deletion, and monitoring activities, among others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ISO 27001 certification is particularly relevant for Indian enterprises that work with international counterparties or operate in Europe, the Middle East, or Asia. ISO 27001 carries more weight in procurement and due diligence than SOC 2 alone in these regions. For Indian enterprises with international counterparties, a CLM vendor that holds ISO 27001 is demonstrating security maturity in a format that international partners recognise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For purely domestic Indian enterprise use, ISO 27001 is relevant as a demonstration of systematic security management, but DPDPA compliance and data residency in India may be more directly relevant for regulatory purposes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ISO 27001 certification covers a defined scope. A vendor can hold ISO 27001 certification for one part of their organisation while the systems handling your data fall outside that scope. The scope statement in the certificate defines what is covered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ask vendors to provide the certificate and scope statement. Review the scope to confirm that it explicitly covers the systems and processes that will handle your contract data. A certificate that covers the vendor’s corporate headquarters but not the specific product or data centre where your data will be stored is not full coverage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ISO 27001 is not a one-time certification. The standard requires annual surveillance audits and full recertification every three years. Confirm that the vendor’s certificate is current, that surveillance audits have been completed on schedule, and that the recertification cycle is on track.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A certificate that was issued in 2022 without subsequent surveillance audits is a lapsed compliance posture even if the certificate itself has not expired.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Based on the frameworks above, the specific questions that should be asked in any CLM security evaluation are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n For SOC 2:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n For ISO 27001:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Both SOC 2 and ISO 27001 are global frameworks. They do not address India-specific regulatory requirements that are directly relevant to CLM security evaluation for Indian enterprises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 imposes specific obligations on the processing of personal data of Indian citizens. For CLM platforms that store contracts containing personal data of employees, counterparty individuals, or beneficiaries, the vendor’s data processing practices need to comply with DPDPA requirements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n SOC 2 and ISO 27001 do not certify DPDPA compliance. A vendor can hold both certifications and still not meet DPDPA requirements on data localisation, purpose limitation, or breach notification timelines. Ask specifically: how does the vendor address DPDPA compliance? Are there specific controls or contractual commitments that reflect DPDPA obligations?<\/p>\n\n\n\n For Indian enterprises in regulated sectors, data residency requirements from RBI, IRDAI, and SEBI add obligations beyond DPDPA. These require that specific categories of data be stored and processed on servers in India. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 do not address data residency requirements. A vendor can hold both certifications while processing data on servers outside India.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ask explicitly: where is our contract data stored at rest? Where is it processed? Does the vendor support data residency in India? Is this available on the pricing tier being evaluated, or only on enterprise tiers? How are data residency commitments documented in the vendor contract?<\/p>\n\n\n\n For enterprises in banking, insurance, and financial services, sector-specific security requirements from RBI and IRDAI add to the general security baseline. The RBI’s guidelines on IT security for banks and the IRDAI’s information and cyber security guidelines define specific security standards that CLM vendors need to meet to serve regulated entities in these sectors. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 do not certify compliance with these sector-specific frameworks. Ask whether the vendor has undergone any sector-specific assessments relevant to your regulatory context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications cover security controls at a framework level. They do not substitute for independent penetration testing, which assesses the actual security posture of the specific systems against active exploitation techniques.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Enterprise CLM evaluation should include asking for evidence of recent penetration testing. The questions to ask are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n A vendor that has not conducted penetration testing within the last twelve months, or that cannot provide evidence of a third-party test, has a gap in their security assurance that certifications alone do not fill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A complete CLM security evaluation for SOC 2 and ISO 27001 readiness produces the following assessment:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Certification currency and type:<\/strong> SOC 2 Type II with a recent audit period and minimal exceptions. ISO 27001:2022 with a current certificate, recent surveillance audit, and scope that covers the relevant systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Scope coverage:<\/strong> Both certifications explicitly cover the systems and environments where contract data will be stored and processed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Exception review:<\/strong> Any exceptions in the SOC 2 report are documented, remediated, and explained.<\/p>\n\n\n\n India-specific compliance:<\/strong> Specific confirmation of DPDPA compliance, data residency in India, and sector-specific security requirements where applicable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Penetration testing:<\/strong> Evidence of recent third-party penetration testing with a defined remediation process for findings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Contractual commitments:<\/strong> Security commitments, data residency terms, and incident notification obligations are documented in the vendor contract, not just asserted verbally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Enterprise procurement teams that evaluate CLM tools against this framework are assessing security posture rather than security marketing. The additional questions take time but produce a significantly more accurate picture of what the vendor’s certifications actually mean for the organisation’s specific risk profile.<\/p>\n\n\n\n SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications are a necessary but not sufficient basis for CLM security evaluation. They are meaningful when they are the right type, are current, cover the relevant scope, and have been reviewed for exceptions and remediation. They are incomplete when they are the only evidence reviewed and when India-specific regulatory requirements are not separately addressed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For Indian enterprise procurement teams evaluating CLM platforms, the security evaluation needs to go beyond certification badges to the specific questions that certifications do not answer: what is the audit period, what exceptions were found, is data stored in India, and how are DPDPA obligations met. The answers to these questions determine whether the vendor’s security posture actually meets the organisation’s requirements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n SOC 2 Type I is a point-in-time assessment confirming that security controls were designed and in place on a specific audit date. SOC 2 Type II covers an extended period, typically six to twelve months, and confirms that controls actually operated effectively throughout that period. Type II is the meaningful certification for enterprise procurement and is what should be requested when evaluating a CLM vendor.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n The ISO 27001 scope statement defines what parts of the vendor’s organisation and which systems are covered by the certification. A vendor can hold ISO 27001 certification for one part of their organisation while the systems handling your data fall outside the scope. Reviewing the scope statement confirms that the certification covers the specific systems and processes that will handle your contract data.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n No. Both SOC 2 and ISO 27001 are global frameworks and do not certify compliance with the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. A vendor can hold both certifications and still not meet DPDPA requirements on data localisation, purpose limitation, or breach notification timelines. DPDPA compliance needs to be separately assessed and contractually committed to.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Indian enterprises should ask where contract data is stored at rest and where it is processed, whether the vendor supports data residency in India, whether this is available on the pricing tier being evaluated, and how data residency commitments are documented in the vendor contract. For enterprises in regulated sectors with RBI, IRDAI, or SEBI obligations, data residency requirements may be mandatory rather than optional.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n SOC 2 and ISO 27001 assess security controls at a framework level. They do not simulate active exploitation of specific system vulnerabilities. Independent penetration testing assesses the actual security posture of the specific systems against current exploitation techniques. A vendor that has not conducted recent third-party penetration testing has a gap in their security assurance that certifications do not fill.<\/p>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" CLM security evaluation is not completed by confirming that a vendor holds SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications. Most enterprise CLM vendors hold one or both. The certifications are a starting point, not a conclusion. What they tell you depends on what type of certification it is, what scope it covers, how old it is, whether it has any noted exceptions, and whether the scope actually covers the systems and data handling practices that are relevant to your use case. Enterprise procurement teams that complete CLM security evaluation at the badge level, noting “SOC 2 yes, ISO 27001 yes”, and moving on, are accepting a vendor’s self-selected evidence of their security posture. The evaluation does not surface the questions that matter: whether the certification covers the data that will actually be processed, whether the controls operated effectively over time, and whether the vendor’s security practices meet the specific requirements of the Indian regulatory environment. This article explains what SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications mean in the context of CLM evaluation, how to interpret them correctly, and what the India-specific security requirements are that these global certifications do not automatically address. What SOC 2 Is and What It Actually Tells You SOC 2 is a framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants that evaluates how a service organisation manages data against five Trust Services Criteria: Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy. Type I versus Type II This distinction is the first and most important thing to establish in a CLM security evaluation. SOC 2 Type I is a point-in-time assessment. An auditor reviews the vendor’s security controls and confirms that they were designed and in place at a specific date. Type I tells you that controls existed on audit day. It does not tell you whether those controls worked over time. SOC 2 Type II covers an extended audit period, typically six to twelve months. The auditor tests whether the controls actually operated effectively throughout that period. Type II is the meaningful certification for enterprise procurement purposes. A Type II report with a twelve-month audit period tells you that controls were in place and functional over an extended period of time, not just on a single day. Always ask for SOC 2 Type II. If a vendor presents a Type I report, ask why they do not have Type II and what their timeline is for obtaining it. What the five criteria cover Security is the only mandatory criterion in a SOC 2 report. It covers protection against unauthorised access, both physical and logical. The other four criteria are included based on the vendor’s product scope and customer requirements. For a CLM platform, the criteria most relevant to your evaluation are: Security: Access controls, encryption, vulnerability management, and monitoring. This is mandatory and should be in every SOC 2 report. Confidentiality: Protection of information designated as confidential. For a CLM platform that stores commercially sensitive contracts, pricing terms, and negotiated provisions, confidentiality is directly relevant. Ask whether the vendor’s SOC 2 scope includes the Confidentiality criterion. Availability: System uptime and performance against defined commitments. If your enterprise depends on the CLM for time-sensitive contract workflows, availability is relevant. Privacy: Handling of personal information in accordance with the vendor’s stated privacy practices. If contracts stored in the CLM contain personal data of individuals, the Privacy criterion is relevant. Reading a SOC 2 report for exceptions A SOC 2 Type II report includes the auditor’s findings on each tested control. When controls did not operate as designed during the audit period, the report notes exceptions. These exceptions are the most important part of the report for procurement evaluation. An exception in a SOC 2 report means that a control that was supposed to work did not work at some point during the audit period. The vendor’s response to the exception, and whether it has been remediated, should be requested and reviewed. A vendor with one or two exceptions in an otherwise clean report is not necessarily a red flag if the remediation was prompt and documented. A vendor with multiple exceptions across key security controls is providing evidence of systemic control weakness that the certification badge does not surface. Ask vendors specifically: are there any noted exceptions in your most recent SOC 2 Type II report? How have they been remediated? Audit period currency A SOC 2 Type II report from two years ago is not current evidence of security posture. Security environments change: new vulnerabilities emerge, new system components are deployed, staff changes occur. An evaluation based on a two-year-old report is an evaluation of security posture that may no longer reflect the current state. Ask when the most recent SOC 2 Type II audit period ended. Anything beyond twelve months ago should be followed up with a question about when the next audit is expected. What ISO 27001 Is and What It Actually Tells You ISO 27001 is an international standard for Information Security Management Systems published by the International Organization for Standardization. Where SOC 2 assesses specific security controls in a product or service, ISO 27001 certifies that the vendor’s organisation operates a systematic, risk-based approach to information security management. The current standard: ISO\/IEC 27001:2022 The current version of the standard is ISO\/IEC 27001:2022, published in October 2022. The previous version, ISO\/IEC 27001:2013, was withdrawn, with the transition deadline passing on October 31, 2025. Vendors who hold a 2013 certification that has not been transitioned to the 2022 standard are holding a lapsed certification. Confirm that the vendor holds the 2022 version. The 2022 update restructured the Annex A controls from 114 controls across 14 domains to 93 controls across 4 themes: Organisational (37 controls), People (8 controls), Physical (14 controls), and Technological (34 controls). New controls were added covering cloud security, data masking, information deletion, and monitoring activities, among others. Why ISO 27001 matters for Indian enterprises with international operations ISO 27001 certification is particularly relevant for Indian enterprises that work with international<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":27068,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"set","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[64],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27066","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-contract-management"],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/CLM-security-evaluation.jpg",1200,628,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/CLM-security-evaluation-150x150.jpg",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/CLM-security-evaluation-300x157.jpg",300,157,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/CLM-security-evaluation-768x402.jpg",768,402,true],"large":["https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/CLM-security-evaluation-1024x536.jpg",1024,536,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/CLM-security-evaluation.jpg",1200,628,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/CLM-security-evaluation.jpg",1200,628,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Mansi Rana","author_link":"https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/author\/mansi-rana\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"CLM security evaluation is not completed by confirming that a vendor holds SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certifications. Most enterprise CLM vendors hold one or both. The certifications are a starting point, not a conclusion. What they tell you depends on what type of certification it is, what scope it covers, how old it is,…","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27066","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27066"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27066\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27067,"href":"https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27066\/revisions\/27067"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27068"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27066"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27066"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legistify.com\/learn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27066"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}What the five criteria cover<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Reading a SOC 2 report for exceptions<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Audit period currency<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
What ISO 27001 Is and What It Actually Tells You<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The current standard: ISO\/IEC 27001:2022<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Why ISO 27001 matters for Indian enterprises with international operations<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Reading the ISO 27001 certificate scope statement<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Surveillance audits and recertification<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
The CLM Security Evaluation Questions for SOC 2 and ISO 27001<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
What SOC 2 and ISO 27001 Do Not Cover for Indian Enterprises<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
DPDPA compliance<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Data residency in India<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Sector-specific security requirements<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Penetration Testing and Vulnerability Management<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Putting the Evaluation Together<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Conclusion<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Frequently Asked Questions<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n
What is the difference between SOC 2 Type I and SOC 2 Type II?<\/strong><\/h4>\n
What does the ISO 27001 scope statement mean?<\/strong><\/h4>\n
Does SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certify DPDPA compliance?<\/strong><\/h4>\n
What should Indian enterprises ask about data residency when evaluating CLM tools?<\/strong><\/h4>\n
Why is penetration testing relevant to CLM security evaluation if the vendor is SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certified?<\/strong><\/h4>\n